From 6ea3a44cef28add2d93b1ef119d84886cb1e3c9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pengjie Zhang Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 21:22:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: CPPC: Fix missing PCC check for guaranteed_perf The current implementation overlooks the 'guaranteed_perf' register in this check. If the Guaranteed Performance register is located in the PCC subspace, the function currently attempts to read it without acquiring the lock and without sending the CMD_READ doorbell to the firmware. This can result in reading stale data. Fixes: 29523f095397 ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performance") Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang Cc: 4.20+ # 4.20+ [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251210132227.1988380-1-zhangpengjie2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 3bdeeee3414e..e66e20d1f31b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -1366,7 +1366,8 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) /* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/ if (CPC_IN_PCC(highest_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(lowest_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(lowest_non_linear_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nominal_reg) || - CPC_IN_PCC(low_freq_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nom_freq_reg)) { + CPC_IN_PCC(low_freq_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nom_freq_reg) || + CPC_IN_PCC(guaranteed_reg)) { if (pcc_ss_id < 0) { pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id\n"); return -ENODEV; -- 2.47.3