From 70bbf436df2d17f23d9cb21d1fa3b644d66be597 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alejandro Colomar Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:45:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] man/man2/signal.2: VERSIONS: The typedef-less definition of signal(2) isn't hard to read At least if you use typeof(). Acked-by: Jorenar Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar --- man/man2/signal.2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/man2/signal.2 b/man/man2/signal.2 index 1e0e5f6c1..c8ea9a9ac 100644 --- a/man/man2/signal.2 +++ b/man/man2/signal.2 @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ or .B _DEFAULT_SOURCE (glibc 2.19 and later) is defined. -Without use of such a type, the declaration of +The standard definition of .BR signal () -is the somewhat harder to read: +is: .P .in +4n .EX -- 2.47.2