From 886150fb4f19505b8f9d26201d7671b25c233a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:28:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Don't stop time readers across hard_pps() update hard_pps() update does not modify anything which might be required by time readers so forcing readers out of the way during the update is a pointless exercise. The interaction with adjtimex() and timekeeper updates which call into the NTP code is properly serialized by timekeeper_lock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-2-554456a44a15@linutronix.de --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 2bc3542f29a2c..ff98a0b54b54e 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -2746,11 +2746,7 @@ void hardpps(const struct timespec64 *phase_ts, const struct timespec64 *raw_ts) unsigned long flags; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags); - write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq); - __hardpps(phase_ts, raw_ts); - - write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(hardpps); -- 2.39.5