From 8a361405375a82ed1975c72b9900a6775e0de037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juzhe-Zhong Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 20:55:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of pr65947-8.c for RVV This test is testing fold_extract_last pattern so it's more reasonable use vect_fold_extract_last instead of specifying targets. This is the vect_fold_extract_last property: proc check_effective_target_vect_fold_extract_last { } { return [expr { [check_effective_target_aarch64_sve] || [istarget amdgcn*-*-*] || [check_effective_target_riscv_v] }] } include ARM SVE/GCN/RVV. It perfectly matches what we want and more reasonable, better maintainment. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c: Use vect_fold_extract_last. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c index d0426792e353..9ced4dbb69fd 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-8.c @@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ main (void) return 0; } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { ! { amdgcn*-*-* || aarch64_sve } } } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { amdgcn*-*-* || aarch64_sve } } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "multiple types in double reduction or condition reduction" "vect" { target { ! { amdgcn*-*-* || aarch64_sve } } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { ! { vect_fold_extract_last } } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { vect_fold_extract_last } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "multiple types in double reduction or condition reduction" "vect" { target { ! { vect_fold_extract_last } } } } } */ -- 2.47.2