From 8aa7f12a66e0055ec547978415093a494bd264e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Jagielski Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:51:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Ask a question, since I'm lazy until tomorrow :) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x@395401 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 872d9e24d47..d43481d401d 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ PROPOSED PATCHES FOR THIS RELEASE: a direct copy of ap_process_resource_config(), warts and all. That's where the fprintf's come from; it's existing behaviour. + Jim asks: but aren't we already getting that info when + we run ap_process_resource_config()? In other words, aren't + we just double printing the status info? (PS: No, I haven't + tried the patch yet, which, of course, would answer this + directly :) ) RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: -- 2.47.2