From 94802548bc275d086b0742508a6c1e4afcd136bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Oliva Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:26:38 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: xfail scev-[35].c on ia32 These gimplefe tests never got the desired optimization on ia32, but they only started visibly failing when the representation of MEMs in dumps changed from printing 'symbol: a' to '&a'. The transformation is not considered profitable on ia32, that's why it doesn't take place. Maybe that's a bug in itself, but it's not a regression, and not something to be noisy about. for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c: xfail on ia32. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c: Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c index 4babd33f5c06..ac8c8d4519e3 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c @@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ __BB(6): } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c index c2feebdfc248..c911a9298866 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c @@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ __BB(6): } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "&a" 1 "ivopts" { xfail ia32 } } } */ -- 2.47.2