From 9a54db29387c4e936ab99499bf4d3e1649e92800 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Sandiford Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:43:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: XFAIL two insv_1.c tests [PR87763] This patch XFAILs the remaining regressions in PR87763. We should still fix them at some point, but that's not GCC 11 material. gcc/testsuite/ PR target/87763 * gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c: XFAIL two scan tests. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c index 9efa22e649d6..a1d26b0136b7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ typedef struct bitfield bitfield bfi1 (bitfield a) { - /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" } } */ + /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ a.eight = 3; return a; } @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ bfi1 (bitfield a) bitfield bfi2 (bitfield a) { - /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" } } */ + /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ a.five = 7; return a; } -- 2.47.2