From a9ad08042dcea9751283ad2681a485cb6b23f700 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Michelson Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:30:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Merged revisions 208314 via svnmerge from https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk ................ r208314 | mmichelson | 2009-07-23 11:29:37 -0500 (Thu, 23 Jul 2009) | 9 lines Merged revisions 208312 via svnmerge from https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4 ........ r208312 | mmichelson | 2009-07-23 11:29:18 -0500 (Thu, 23 Jul 2009) | 3 lines Remove inaccurate XXX comment. ........ ................ git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.6.0@208316 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3 --- channels/chan_sip.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/channels/chan_sip.c b/channels/chan_sip.c index 223f4982ed..d4640b7320 100644 --- a/channels/chan_sip.c +++ b/channels/chan_sip.c @@ -15648,10 +15648,6 @@ static void handle_response_invite(struct sip_pvt *p, int resp, char *rest, stru * a 100 Trying response. We're just going to treat this sort of thing * the same as we would treat a 180 Ringing */ - /*XXX I'm just following the same procedure for a 180 response, which - * doesn't change the invitestate of p. Shouldn't it be INV_PROCEEDING - * though? - */ if (!req->ignore && p->owner) { ast_queue_control(p->owner, AST_CONTROL_RINGING); } -- 2.47.2