From ae275b986b8cc747a5b4f389cb05a71fdee1f886 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marek Polacek Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:33:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] c++: explicit(bool) malfunction with dependent expression [PR95066] I forgot to set DECL_HAS_DEPENDENT_EXPLICIT_SPEC_P when merging two function declarations and as a sad consequence, we never tsubsted the dependent explicit-specifier in tsubst_function_decl, leading to disregarding the explicit-specifier altogether, and wrongly accepting this test. PR c++/95066 * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Set DECL_HAS_DEPENDENT_EXPLICIT_SPEC_P. * g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/decl.c | 2 ++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c index ae8fd32d83b9..4199778fe4eb 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -2035,6 +2035,8 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl, bool newdecl_is_friend) DECL_FINAL_P (newdecl) |= DECL_FINAL_P (olddecl); DECL_OVERRIDE_P (newdecl) |= DECL_OVERRIDE_P (olddecl); DECL_THIS_STATIC (newdecl) |= DECL_THIS_STATIC (olddecl); + DECL_HAS_DEPENDENT_EXPLICIT_SPEC_P (newdecl) + |= DECL_HAS_DEPENDENT_EXPLICIT_SPEC_P (olddecl); if (DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_P (olddecl)) DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_CODE_RAW (newdecl) = DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_CODE_RAW (olddecl); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9d95b0d669e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/explicit16.C @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// PR c++/95066 - explicit malfunction with dependent expression. +// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } } + +template +struct Foo { + template + explicit(static_cast(true)) operator Foo(); +}; + +template +template +Foo::operator Foo() { + return {}; +} + +int +main () +{ + Foo a; + Foo b = a; // { dg-error "conversion" } +} -- 2.47.2