From ae2f6e01749f39b8b8ccc211fc29e5e6ec8b57cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Rodgers Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:12:03 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix "bare" notifications dropped by waiters check For types that track whether or not there extant waiters (e.g. semaphore) internally, the __atomic_notify_address_bare() call was introduced to avoid the overhead of loading the atomic count of waiters. For platforms that don't have Futex, however, there was still a check for waiters, and seeing that there are none (because in the bare case, the count is not incremented), the notification is dropped. This commit addresses that case. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/atomic_wait.h: Always notify waiters in the case of 'bare' address notification. --- libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h index 0ac5575190c6..984ed70f16c9 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h @@ -226,9 +226,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION } void - _M_notify(const __platform_wait_t* __addr, bool __all) noexcept + _M_notify(const __platform_wait_t* __addr, bool __all, bool __bare) noexcept { - if (!_M_waiting()) + if (!(__bare || _M_waiting())) return; #ifdef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_PLATFORM_WAIT @@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION } void - _M_notify(bool __all) + _M_notify(bool __all, bool __bare = false) { if (_M_addr == &_M_w._M_ver) __atomic_fetch_add(_M_addr, 1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL); - _M_w._M_notify(_M_addr, __all); + _M_w._M_notify(_M_addr, __all, __bare); } template