From bfce8e4273d81a1d056ed3d79a27e1b2c4f60759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matvey Kovalev Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:35:20 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: delete unreachable confusing code in nfs4_open_delegation() op_delegate_type is assigned OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE just before the if-block where condition specifies it not be equal to OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE. Compiler treats the block as unreachable and optimizes it out from the resulting executable. In that aspect commit d08d32e6e5c0 ("nfsd4: return delegation immediately if lease fails") notably makes no difference. Seems it's better to just drop this code instead of fiddling with memory barriers or atomics. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Signed-off-by: Matvey Kovalev Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index af7a20ded1cac..085f5ef12230d 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -6362,11 +6362,6 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_open *open, return; out_no_deleg: open->op_delegate_type = OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE; - if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS && - open->op_delegate_type != OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE) { - dprintk("NFSD: WARNING: refusing delegation reclaim\n"); - open->op_recall = true; - } /* 4.1 client asking for a delegation? */ if (open->op_deleg_want) -- 2.47.3