From c262befad274d138e5639468574190eef71e2e1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Seward Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:45:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update expected output. git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@11442 --- helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 b/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 index 5c6a8fc0eb..f8e4a5050b 100644 --- a/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 +++ b/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc25-amd64 @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...) by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32) by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50) + Lock was previously acquired + at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32) + by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49) Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...) -- 2.47.2