From c8c93616f581d08036831116abadf4390c9e0b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Trawick Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:40:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] complain^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hask humbly about a missing feature in the ECC proposal git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@1512644 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 6438fc78e9c..f427673a8a5 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: http://svn.apache.org/r1509875 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~sf/ECC-2.2.diff +1: sf + trawick: Is there any particular reason that the patch doesn't + define OPENSSL_NO_EC for older OpenSSL levels and use + that as the feature check, as is done in the 2.4.x + branch? I guess I can help out with that if it is just + a matter of labor. * mod_ssl config: Fix range check bug with SSLRenegBufferSize trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r954641 -- 2.47.2