From cbef364cdf241bf064e91277607b83c21812f11f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Bray <noodl@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:02:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update transformations

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@687499 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
 docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.html.en | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.html.en b/docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.html.en
index 1d18664eda0..aad6f29c434 100644
--- a/docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.html.en
+++ b/docs/manual/mod/mod_ssl.html.en
@@ -358,10 +358,10 @@ authentication. Because although placing a CA certificate of the
 server certificate chain into <code class="directive"><a href="#sslcacertificatepath">SSLCACertificatePath</a></code> has the same effect
 for the certificate chain construction, it has the side-effect that
 client certificates issued by this same CA certificate are also
-accepted on client authentication. That's usually not one expect.</p>
+accepted on client authentication.</p>
 <p>
 But be careful: Providing the certificate chain works only if you are using a
-<em>single</em> (either RSA <em>or</em> DSA) based server certificate. If you are
+<em>single</em> RSA <em>or</em> DSA based server certificate. If you are
 using a coupled RSA+DSA certificate pair, this will work only if actually both
 certificates use the <em>same</em> certificate chain. Else the browsers will be
 confused in this situation.</p>
-- 
2.47.2