From d327e7166efa24c69719890ea332b55a9dea21a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Stultz Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 01:35:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] test-ww_mutex: Move work to its own UNBOUND workqueue The test-ww_mutex test already allocates its own workqueue so be sure to use it for the mtx.work and abba.work rather then the default system workqueue. This resolves numerous messages of the sort: "workqueue: test_abba_work hogged CPU... consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND" "workqueue: test_mutex_work hogged CPU... consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND" Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251205013515.759030-3-jstultz@google.com --- kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c index d27aaaa860a36..30512b3e95c99 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int __test_mutex(struct ww_class *class, unsigned int flags) init_completion(&mtx.done); mtx.flags = flags; - schedule_work(&mtx.work); + queue_work(wq, &mtx.work); wait_for_completion(&mtx.ready); ww_mutex_lock(&mtx.mutex, (flags & TEST_MTX_CTX) ? &ctx : NULL); @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int test_abba(struct ww_class *class, bool trylock, bool resolve) abba.trylock = trylock; abba.resolve = resolve; - schedule_work(&abba.work); + queue_work(wq, &abba.work); ww_acquire_init_noinject(&ctx, class); if (!trylock) -- 2.47.3