From e0f4fcf9dfb8794a11d4ee63899b820aa9257f50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 07:57:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Add testcase for DR 2604

As the following testcase shows, I think we don't inherit template's
attributes into specializations.

2022-11-15  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..64bdf5d11a86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2604.C
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// DR 2604 - Attributes for an explicit specialization.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wunused-parameter" }
+
+template<typename>
+[[noreturn]] void
+foo ([[maybe_unused]] int i)
+{
+  for (;;);
+}
+
+template<>
+void
+foo<int> (int i)	// { dg-warning "unused parameter 'i'" }
+{
+}
+
+template<typename>
+void
+bar (int i)		// { dg-warning "unused parameter 'i'" }
+{
+}
+
+template<>
+[[noreturn]] void
+bar<int> ([[maybe_unused]] int i)
+{
+  for (;;);
+}
+
+[[noreturn]] void
+baz ()
+{
+  foo<long> (0);
+}
+
+[[noreturn]] void
+qux ()
+{
+  foo<int> (0);
+}			// { dg-warning "'noreturn' function does return" }
+
+[[noreturn]] void
+garply ()
+{
+  bar<long> (0);
+}			// { dg-warning "'noreturn' function does return" }
+
+[[noreturn]] void
+corge ()
+{
+  bar<int> (0);
+}
-- 
2.47.2