From e163dbbc4433e598cad7e6011b255d1d6ad93a3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:02:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] c: Fix ICE on deferred pragma in unknown attribute arguments [PR103587] We ICE on the following testcase, because c_parser_balanced_token_sequence when encountering a deferred pragma will just use c_parser_consume_token which the FE doesn't allow for CPP_PRAGMA tokens (and if that wasn't the case, it could ICE on CPP_PRAGMA_EOL similarly). We don't know in what exact context the pragma appears when we don't know what those arguments semantically mean, so I think we should just skip over them, like e.g. the C++ FE does. And, I think (/[/{ vs. )/]/} from outside of the pragma shouldn't be paired with those inside of the pragma and it doesn't seem to be necessary to check that inside of the pragma line itself all the paren kinds are balanced. 2021-12-14 Jakub Jelinek PR c/103587 * c-parser.c (c_parser_balanced_token_sequence): For CPP_PRAGMA, consume the pragma and silently skip to the pragma eol. * gcc.dg/pr103587.c: New test. --- gcc/c/c-parser.c | 5 +++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103587.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103587.c diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c index e25df4f26d66..d7e5f051ac0a 100644 --- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c +++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c @@ -4846,6 +4846,11 @@ c_parser_balanced_token_sequence (c_parser *parser) case CPP_EOF: return; + case CPP_PRAGMA: + c_parser_consume_pragma (parser); + c_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol (parser, false); + break; + default: c_parser_consume_token (parser); break; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103587.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103587.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1cbc4d52d9df --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr103587.c @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +/* PR c/103587 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "" } */ + +[[foo::bar( +#pragma GCC ivdep +)]]; /* { dg-warning "attribute ignored" } */ -- 2.47.2