From e3f5055a5e01daa5587ef2285423be77cb94d463 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "zhangwei(Jovi)" Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:31:18 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Add TRACE_ITER_PRINTK flag check in __trace_puts/__trace_bputs commit f0160a5a2912267c02cfe692eac955c360de5fdf upstream. The TRACE_ITER_PRINTK check in __trace_puts/__trace_bputs is missing, so add it, to be consistent with __trace_printk/__trace_bprintk. Those functions are all called by the same function: trace_printk(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/51E7A7D6.8090900@huawei.com Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index 4c32d8e6f2465..4dcbf7dc3c510 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -468,6 +468,9 @@ int __trace_puts(unsigned long ip, const char *str, int size) int alloc; int pc; + if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_PRINTK)) + return 0; + pc = preempt_count(); if (unlikely(tracing_selftest_running || tracing_disabled)) @@ -515,6 +518,9 @@ int __trace_bputs(unsigned long ip, const char *str) int size = sizeof(struct bputs_entry); int pc; + if (!(trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_PRINTK)) + return 0; + pc = preempt_count(); if (unlikely(tracing_selftest_running || tracing_disabled)) -- 2.47.2