From e52f21fc9d6810628052249fa0873723eeaa47f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:34:32 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] * Remove obsolete comment and add a vote

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x@570235 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
 STATUS | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index a845c0ada9e..9b532b56452 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -166,14 +166,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
       adjusted for 2.0 including both patches;
         http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch
         +1: wrowe
-        rpluem says: What is the reason for the patch to Makefile.in in your
-        proposal? Besides I think
-        sed 's#i^LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) $(installbuilddir)/libtool $(LTFLAGS)#'
-        is wrong (Note the i before ^).
-      and prior to r569934;
-        +1: rpluem
       r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch without the Makefile.in:
-        +1: trawick, jim
+        +1: trawick, jim, rpluem
 
     * log core: ensure we use a special pool for stderr logging, so that
       the stderr channel remains valid from the time plog is destroyed,
-- 
2.47.2