From e81e1d79a9743cd6f20429353335c42ecaf10c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Swiatkowski Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:03:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ice: add recipe priority check in search The new recipe should be added even if exactly the same recipe already exists with different priority. Example use case is when the rule is being added from TC tool context. It should has the highest priority, but if the recipe already exists the rule will inherit it priority. It can lead to the situation when the rule added from TC tool has lower priority than expected. The solution is to check the recipe priority when trying to find existing one. Previous recipe is still useful. Example: RID 8 -> priority 4 RID 10 -> priority 7 The difference is only in priority rest is let's say eth + mac + direction. Adding ARP + MAC_A + RX on RID 8, forward to VF0_VSI After that IP + MAC_B + RX on RID 10 (from TC tool), forward to PF0 Both will work. In case of adding ARP + MAC_A + RX on RID 8, forward to VF0_VSI ARP + MAC_A + RX on RID 10, forward to PF0. Only second one will match, but this is expected. Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Tested-by: Sujai Buvaneswaran Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c index 0e740342e2947..4a91e0aaf0a5e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c @@ -4784,7 +4784,8 @@ ice_find_recp(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_prot_lkup_ext *lkup_exts, */ if (found && recp[i].tun_type == rinfo->tun_type && recp[i].need_pass_l2 == rinfo->need_pass_l2 && - recp[i].allow_pass_l2 == rinfo->allow_pass_l2) + recp[i].allow_pass_l2 == rinfo->allow_pass_l2 && + recp[i].priority == rinfo->priority) return i; /* Return the recipe ID */ } } -- 2.47.2