From fcb75cdc7ddf09e88722d44f687634448a89ac48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colm MacCarthaigh Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:31:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Cast two votes, and promote a proposal. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x@389083 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 99a17957172..f690e63e8af 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] + *) mod_speling: Don't crash if r->filename is unset. + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=385580&view=rev + +1: trawick, niq, colm + PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ please place SVN revisions from trunk here, so it is easy to identify exactly what the proposed changes are! Add all new @@ -157,10 +161,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: http://people.apache.org/~trawick/20_ldap_pool.patch +1: trawick - *) mod_speling: Don't crash if r->filename is unset. - http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=385580&view=rev - +1: trawick, niq - *) Make sure we write a reasonable status line (e.g., if byterange filter modifies status and custom status line is left unmodified). @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.0 patch is at http://people.apache.org/~trawick/20_validate_status_line.patch +1: trawick, niq + -0: colm + colm: Wouldn't it be a whole lot less cycles to use ISDIGIT? PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: -- 2.47.2