Back in 0.2.4.3-alpha (
e106812a778f537), when we switched from using
double to using uint64 for selecting by bandwidth, I got the math
wrong: I should have used llround(x), or (uint64_t)(x+0.5), but
instead I wrote llround(x+0.5). That means we would always round
up, rather than rounding to the closest integer
Fixes bug 23318; bugfix on 0.2.4.3-alpha.
--- /dev/null
+ o Minor bugfixes (path selection):
+ - When selecting relays by bandwidth, avoid a rounding error that
+ could sometimes cause load to be imbalanced incorrectly. Previously,
+ we would always round upwards; now, we round towards the nearest
+ integer. This had the biggest effect when a relay's weight adjustments
+ should have given it weight 0, but it got weight 1 instead.
+ Fixes bug 23318; bugfix on 0.2.4.3-alpha.
final_weight = weight*this_bw;
}
- bandwidths[node_sl_idx] = final_weight + 0.5;
+ bandwidths[node_sl_idx] = final_weight;
} SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END(node);
log_debug(LD_CIRC, "Generated weighted bandwidths for rule %s based "