1. A string in decimal-dot notation, consisting of four decimal integers in
the inclusive range 0--255, separated by dots (e.g. ``192.168.0.1``). Each
integer represents an octet (byte) in the address. Leading zeroes are
- tolerated only for values less than 8 (as there is no ambiguity
- between the decimal and octal interpretations of such strings).
+ not tolerated to prevent confusion with octal notation.
2. An integer that fits into 32 bits.
3. An integer packed into a :class:`bytes` object of length 4 (most
significant octet first).
>>> ipaddress.IPv4Address(b'\xC0\xA8\x00\x01')
IPv4Address('192.168.0.1')
+
+ .. versionchanged:: 3.8
+
+ Leading zeros are tolerated, even in ambiguous cases that look like
+ octal notation.
+
+ .. versionchanged:: 3.8.12
+
+ Leading zeros are no longer tolerated and are treated as an error.
+ IPv4 address strings are now parsed as strict as glibc
+ :func:`~socket.inet_pton`.
+
.. attribute:: version
The appropriate version number: ``4`` for IPv4, ``6`` for IPv6.
characters are controlled by a new module level variable
``urllib.parse._UNSAFE_URL_BYTES_TO_REMOVE``. (See :issue:`43882`)
+
+Notable changes in Python 3.8.12
+================================
+
+Changes in the Python API
+-------------------------
+
+Starting with Python 3.8.12 the :mod:`ipaddress` module no longer accepts
+any leading zeros in IPv4 address strings. Leading zeros are ambiguous and
+interpreted as octal notation by some libraries. For example the legacy
+function :func:`socket.inet_aton` treats leading zeros as octal notatation.
+glibc implementation of modern :func:`~socket.inet_pton` does not accept
+any leading zeros.
+
+(Originally contributed by Christian Heimes in :issue:`36384`, and backported
+to 3.8 by Achraf Merzouki)
if len(octet_str) > 3:
msg = "At most 3 characters permitted in %r"
raise ValueError(msg % octet_str)
+ # Handle leading zeros as strict as glibc's inet_pton()
+ # See security bug bpo-36384
+ if octet_str != '0' and octet_str[0] == '0':
+ msg = "Leading zeros are not permitted in %r"
+ raise ValueError(msg % octet_str)
# Convert to integer (we know digits are legal)
octet_int = int(octet_str, 10)
if octet_int > 255:
class CommonTestMixin_v4(CommonTestMixin):
def test_leading_zeros(self):
- self.assertInstancesEqual("000.000.000.000", "0.0.0.0")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("192.168.000.001", "192.168.0.1")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("016.016.016.016", "16.16.16.16")
- self.assertInstancesEqual("001.000.008.016", "1.0.8.16")
+ # bpo-36384: no leading zeros to avoid ambiguity with octal notation
+ msg = "Leading zeros are not permitted in '\d+'"
+ addresses = [
+ "000.000.000.000",
+ "192.168.000.001",
+ "016.016.016.016",
+ "192.168.000.001",
+ "001.000.008.016",
+ "01.2.3.40",
+ "1.02.3.40",
+ "1.2.03.40",
+ "1.2.3.040",
+ ]
+ for address in addresses:
+ with self.subTest(address=address):
+ with self.assertAddressError(msg):
+ self.factory(address)
def test_int(self):
self.assertInstancesEqual(0, "0.0.0.0")
--- /dev/null
+:mod:`ipaddress` module no longer accepts any leading zeros in IPv4 address
+strings. Leading zeros are ambiguous and interpreted as octal notation by
+some libraries. For example the legacy function :func:`socket.inet_aton`
+treats leading zeros as octal notatation. glibc implementation of modern
+:func:`~socket.inet_pton` does not accept any leading zeros. For a while
+the :mod:`ipaddress` module used to accept ambiguous leading zeros.