[ Upstream commit
e400cfa38bb0419cf1313e5494ea2b7d114e86d7 ]
Even if OOB data is recv()ed, ioctl(SIOCATMARK) must return 1 when the
OOB skb is at the head of the receive queue and no new OOB data is queued.
Without fix:
# RUN msg_oob.no_peek.oob ...
# msg_oob.c:305:oob:Expected answ[0] (0) == oob_head (1)
# oob: Test terminated by assertion
# FAIL msg_oob.no_peek.oob
not ok 2 msg_oob.no_peek.oob
With fix:
# RUN msg_oob.no_peek.oob ...
# OK msg_oob.no_peek.oob
ok 2 msg_oob.no_peek.oob
Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
case SIOCATMARK:
{
+ struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *skb;
int answ = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
+
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
- if (skb && skb == READ_ONCE(unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb))
- answ = 1;
+ if (skb) {
+ struct sk_buff *oob_skb = READ_ONCE(u->oob_skb);
+
+ if (skb == oob_skb ||
+ (!oob_skb && !unix_skb_len(skb)))
+ answ = 1;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
+
err = put_user(answ, (int __user *)arg);
}
break;