4.19-stable patches

added patches:
	tracing-fix-check-for-trace_percpu_buffer-validity-in-get_trace_buf.patch
	tracing-tag-trace_percpu_buffer-as-a-percpu-pointer.patch

diff --git a/queue-4.19/series b/queue-4.19/series
index e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391..f2c49ecb13204e227c6e6d340fe4256c7f491719 100644 (file)
--- a/queue-4.19/series
+++ b/queue-4.19/series
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+tracing-fix-check-for-trace_percpu_buffer-validity-in-get_trace_buf.patch
+tracing-tag-trace_percpu_buffer-as-a-percpu-pointer.patch

diff --git a/queue-4.19/tracing-fix-check-for-trace_percpu_buffer-validity-in-get_trace_buf.patch b/queue-4.19/tracing-fix-check-for-trace_percpu_buffer-validity-in-get_trace_buf.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..71972c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/queue-4.19/tracing-fix-check-for-trace_percpu_buffer-validity-in-get_trace_buf.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+From 823e670f7ed616d0ce993075c8afe0217885f79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:04:38 +0530
+Subject: tracing: Fix check for trace_percpu_buffer validity in get_trace_buf()
+
+From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+commit 823e670f7ed616d0ce993075c8afe0217885f79d upstream.
+
+With the new osnoise tracer, we are seeing the below splat:
+    Kernel attempted to read user page (c7d880000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
+    BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc7d880000
+    Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002ffa10
+    Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
+    LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
+    ...
+    NIP [c0000000002ffa10] __trace_array_vprintk.part.0+0x70/0x2f0
+    LR [c0000000002ff9fc] __trace_array_vprintk.part.0+0x5c/0x2f0
+    Call Trace:
+    [c0000008bdd73b80] [c0000000001c49cc] put_prev_task_fair+0x3c/0x60 (unreliable)
+    [c0000008bdd73be0] [c000000000301430] trace_array_printk_buf+0x70/0x90
+    [c0000008bdd73c00] [c0000000003178b0] trace_sched_switch_callback+0x250/0x290
+    [c0000008bdd73c90] [c000000000e70d60] __schedule+0x410/0x710
+    [c0000008bdd73d40] [c000000000e710c0] schedule+0x60/0x130
+    [c0000008bdd73d70] [c000000000030614] interrupt_exit_user_prepare_main+0x264/0x270
+    [c0000008bdd73de0] [c000000000030a70] syscall_exit_prepare+0x150/0x180
+    [c0000008bdd73e10] [c00000000000c174] system_call_vectored_common+0xf4/0x278
+
+osnoise tracer on ppc64le is triggering osnoise_taint() for negative
+duration in get_int_safe_duration() called from
+trace_sched_switch_callback()->thread_exit().
+
+The problem though is that the check for a valid trace_percpu_buffer is
+incorrect in get_trace_buf(). The check is being done after calculating
+the pointer for the current cpu, rather than on the main percpu pointer.
+Fix the check to be against trace_percpu_buffer.
+
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a920e4272e0b0635cf20c444707cbce1b2c8973d.1640255304.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
+
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Fixes: e2ace001176dc9 ("tracing: Choose static tp_printk buffer by explicit nesting count")
+Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ kernel/trace/trace.c |    2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
++++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
+@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static char *get_trace_buf(void)
+ {
+       struct trace_buffer_struct *buffer = this_cpu_ptr(trace_percpu_buffer);
+ 
+-      if (!buffer || buffer->nesting >= 4)
++      if (!trace_percpu_buffer || buffer->nesting >= 4)
+               return NULL;
+ 
+       buffer->nesting++;

diff --git a/queue-4.19/tracing-tag-trace_percpu_buffer-as-a-percpu-pointer.patch b/queue-4.19/tracing-tag-trace_percpu_buffer-as-a-percpu-pointer.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..bdd757b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/queue-4.19/tracing-tag-trace_percpu_buffer-as-a-percpu-pointer.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+From f28439db470cca8b6b082239314e9fd10bd39034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:04:39 +0530
+Subject: tracing: Tag trace_percpu_buffer as a percpu pointer
+
+From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+commit f28439db470cca8b6b082239314e9fd10bd39034 upstream.
+
+Tag trace_percpu_buffer as a percpu pointer to resolve warnings
+reported by sparse:
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3218:46: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3218:46:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3218:46:    got struct trace_buffer_struct *
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3234:9: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3234:9:    expected void const [noderef] __percpu *__vpp_verify
+  /linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:3234:9:    got int *
+
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ebabd3f23101d89cb75671b68b6f819f5edc830b.1640255304.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
+
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
+Fixes: 07d777fe8c398 ("tracing: Add percpu buffers for trace_printk()")
+Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ kernel/trace/trace.c |    4 ++--
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
++++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
+@@ -2812,7 +2812,7 @@ struct trace_buffer_struct {
+       char buffer[4][TRACE_BUF_SIZE];
+ };
+ 
+-static struct trace_buffer_struct *trace_percpu_buffer;
++static struct trace_buffer_struct __percpu *trace_percpu_buffer;
+ 
+ /*
+  * Thise allows for lockless recording.  If we're nested too deeply, then
+@@ -2841,7 +2841,7 @@ static void put_trace_buf(void)
+ 
+ static int alloc_percpu_trace_buffer(void)
+ {
+-      struct trace_buffer_struct *buffers;
++      struct trace_buffer_struct __percpu *buffers;
+ 
+       buffers = alloc_percpu(struct trace_buffer_struct);
+       if (WARN(!buffers, "Could not allocate percpu trace_printk buffer"))