Ammend 122 (Unnamed flag) with v2 discussion

svn:r12032

diff --git a/doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt b/doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt
index 185480be01e3f5945830a701b21fbfe755b19d82..6d3d8c639c1d61174aa6efea7b0f425b7645abe5 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt
+++ b/doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt
@@ -105,7 +105,27 @@ Status: Open
   We need more naming authorities, possibly with some kind of auto-naming
   feature.  This is out-of-scope for this proposal -NM]
 
-4. Other benefits:
+4. Changes to the v2 directory
+
+  Previously v2 authorities that had a binding for a server named Bob did
+  not list any other server named Bob.  This will change too:
+
+  Version 2 authorities will start listing all routers they know about,
+  whether they conflict with a name-binding or not:  Servers for which
+  this authority has a binding will continue to be marked Named,
+  additionally all other servers of that will be listed without the
+  Named flag (i.e. there will be no Unnamed flag in v2 status documents).
+
+  Clients already should handle having a named Bob alongside unnamed
+  Bobs correctly, and having the unnamed Bobs in the status file even
+  without the named server is no worse than the curren status quo where
+  clients learn about those severs from other authorities.
+
+  The benefit of this is that an authority's opinion on a server like
+  Guard, Stable, Fast etc. can now be learned by clients even if that
+  specific authority has reserved that server's name for somebody else.
+
+5. Other benefits:
 
   This new flag will allow people to operate servers that happen to have
   the same nickname as somebody who registered their server two years ago