r15781@catbus: nickm | 2007-10-15 10:59:26 -0400

 Make discard_old_votes part of the consensus publishing process, so we conform to spec, and so we avoid a weird bugs where publishing sets the consensus, setting the consensus makes us reschedule, and rescheduling makes us delay vote-discarding.

svn:r11944

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 1f29a9b21c29b785e0fefd19a284459982f023b6..c3eb64a1009ec55f610595ab49dc9242699f9926 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -6,14 +6,17 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.9-alpha - 2007-10-??
       it. Extra descriptors without any real changes are dropped by the
       authorities, and can screw up our "publish every 18 hours" schedule.
 
-  o Minor features:
+  o Minor features (router descriptor cache):
     - If we find a cached-routers file that's been sitting around for more
       than 28 days unmodified, then most likely it's a leftover from when we
       upgraded to 0.2.0.8-alpha.  Remove it.  It has no good routers anyway.
 
-  o Minor bugfixes:
+  o Minor bugfixes (directory authorities):
     - Correct the implementation of "download votes by digest."  Bugfix on
       0.2.0.8-alpha.
+    - Make the "next period" votes into "current period" votes immediately
+      after publishing the consensus; avoid a heisenbug that made them stick
+      around indefinitely.
 
   o Code simplifications and refactoring:
     - Remove support for the old bw_accounting file: we've been storing

diff --git a/src/or/dirvote.c b/src/or/dirvote.c
index 46266e0ad6bb68a3811d5da9c9674e89fbd76d01..cd9cfac53fdf4d400b0f3de66b101b690c177ecc 100644 (file)
--- a/src/or/dirvote.c
+++ b/src/or/dirvote.c
@@ -1043,8 +1043,6 @@ static struct {
   time_t fetch_missing_signatures;
   /** When do we publish the consensus? */
   time_t interval_starts;
-  /** When do we discard old votes and pending detached signatures? */
-  time_t discard_old_votes;
 
   /* True iff we have generated and distributed our vote. */
   int have_voted;
@@ -1056,7 +1054,7 @@ static struct {
   int have_fetched_missing_signatures;
   /* True iff we have published our consensus. */
   int have_published_consensus;
-} voting_schedule = {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0};
+} voting_schedule = {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0};
 
 /** Set voting_schedule to hold the timing for the next vote we should be
  * doing. */
@@ -1094,8 +1092,6 @@ dirvote_recalculate_timing(time_t now)
   voting_schedule.voting_ends = start - dist_delay;
   voting_schedule.fetch_missing_votes = start - dist_delay - (vote_delay/2);
   voting_schedule.voting_starts = start - dist_delay - vote_delay;
-
-  voting_schedule.discard_old_votes = start;
 }
 
 /** Entry point: Take whatever voting actions are pending as of <b>now</b>. */
@@ -1138,16 +1134,13 @@ dirvote_act(time_t now)
   }
   if (voting_schedule.interval_starts < now &&
       !voting_schedule.have_published_consensus) {
-    log_notice(LD_DIR, "Time to publish the consensus.");
+    log_notice(LD_DIR, "Time to publish the consensus and discard old votes");
     dirvote_publish_consensus();
+    dirvote_clear_votes(0);
     /* XXXX020 we will want to try again later if we haven't got enough
      * signatures yet. */
-    voting_schedule.have_published_consensus = 1;
-  }
-  if (voting_schedule.discard_old_votes < now) {
-    log_notice(LD_DIR, "Time to discard old votes.");
-    dirvote_clear_votes(0);
     dirvote_recalculate_timing(now);
+    voting_schedule.have_published_consensus = 1;
   }
 }