Those are available in all gcc and clang versions that support C11 and as C11
is required as of
f5e0186f865c, then we can add them without capability test.
Having them enabled by default avoid having to chase these manually like
11171fe1fc8,
cdf4b9aff2,
0e72b9d440,
7069dbcc31,
f1283ed6cc,
7b66e2c086,
e95126cf04 and
9f7c527af3 have done.
Also, readline headers trigger a lot of warnings with -Wstrict-prototypes, so
we make use of the system_header pragma to hide the warnings.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
13d51b20-a69c-4ac1-8546-
ec4fc278064f%40eisentraut.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aTFctZwWSpl2/LG5%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
fi
+# These flags are supported in all C11-capable GCC/Clang versions,
+# so no capability test is needed. Added here to avoid affecting configure probes,
+# particularly PGAC_PRINTF_ARCHETYPE which uses -Werror and would fail to detect
+# gnu_printf if -Wstrict-prototypes is active.
+if test "$GCC" = yes -a "$ICC" = no; then
+ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definition"
+fi
+
# --------------------
# Run tests below here
# --------------------
for the exact reason.]])],
[AC_MSG_RESULT([cross-compiling])])
+# These flags are supported in all C11-capable GCC/Clang versions,
+# so no capability test is needed. Added here to avoid affecting configure probes,
+# particularly PGAC_PRINTF_ARCHETYPE which uses -Werror and would fail to detect
+# gnu_printf if -Wstrict-prototypes is active.
+if test "$GCC" = yes -a "$ICC" = no; then
+ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definition"
+fi
+
# --------------------
# Run tests below here
# --------------------
cflags_no_missing_var_decls += '-Wno-missing-variable-declarations'
endif
+# These are C-only flags, supported in all C11-capable GCC/Clang versions.
+cflags_warn += cc.get_supported_arguments(['-Wstrict-prototypes', '-Wold-style-definition'])
# The following tests want to suppress various unhelpful warnings by adding
# -Wno-foo switches. But gcc won't complain about unrecognized -Wno-foo
#ifdef HAVE_LIBREADLINE
#define USE_READLINE 1
+/*
+ * Readline headers trigger a lot of warnings with our preferred compiler flags
+ * (at least -Wstrict-prototypes is known to be problematic). The system_header
+ * pragma hides warnings from within the rest of this file, if supported.
+ */
+#ifdef HAVE_PRAGMA_GCC_SYSTEM_HEADER
+#pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
#if defined(HAVE_READLINE_READLINE_H)
#include <readline/readline.h>
#if defined(HAVE_READLINE_HISTORY_H)