--- /dev/null
+From b9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
+Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:21:46 +0200
+Subject: bpf: Fix masking negation logic upon negative dst register
+
+From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
+
+commit b9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807 upstream.
+
+The negation logic for the case where the off_reg is sitting in the
+dst register is not correct given then we cannot just invert the add
+to a sub or vice versa. As a fix, perform the final bitwise and-op
+unconditionally into AX from the off_reg, then move the pointer from
+the src to dst and finally use AX as the source for the original
+pointer arithmetic operation such that the inversion yields a correct
+result. The single non-AX mov in between is possible given constant
+blinding is retaining it as it's not an immediate based operation.
+
+Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic")
+Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
+Tested-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
+Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
+Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
+Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++--------
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
++++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+@@ -6099,14 +6099,10 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_ve
+ *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
+ *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);
+ *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_AX, 63);
+- if (issrc) {
+- *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX,
+- off_reg);
+- insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
+- } else {
+- *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, off_reg,
+- BPF_REG_AX);
+- }
++ *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
++ if (!issrc)
++ *patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(insn->dst_reg, insn->src_reg);
++ insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
+ if (isneg)
+ insn->code = insn->code == code_add ?
+ code_sub : code_add;