--- /dev/null
+From e84077437902ec99eba0a6b516df772653f142c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
+Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:44:58 +0000
+Subject: EDAC/device: Fix period calculation in edac_device_reset_delay_period()
+
+From: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
+
+commit e84077437902ec99eba0a6b516df772653f142c7 upstream.
+
+Fix period calculation in case user sets a value of 1000. The input of
+round_jiffies_relative() should be in jiffies and not in milli-seconds.
+
+ [ bp: Use the same code pattern as in edac_device_workq_setup() for
+ clarity. ]
+
+Fixes: c4cf3b454eca ("EDAC: Rework workqueue handling")
+Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
+Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
+Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020124458.22153-1-farbere@amazon.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 17 ++++++++---------
+ drivers/edac/edac_module.h | 2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
++++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
+@@ -424,17 +424,16 @@ static void edac_device_workq_teardown(s
+ * Then restart the workq on the new delay
+ */
+ void edac_device_reset_delay_period(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
+- unsigned long value)
++ unsigned long msec)
+ {
+- unsigned long jiffs = msecs_to_jiffies(value);
++ edac_dev->poll_msec = msec;
++ edac_dev->delay = msecs_to_jiffies(msec);
+
+- if (value == 1000)
+- jiffs = round_jiffies_relative(value);
+-
+- edac_dev->poll_msec = value;
+- edac_dev->delay = jiffs;
+-
+- edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, jiffs);
++ /* See comment in edac_device_workq_setup() above */
++ if (edac_dev->poll_msec == 1000)
++ edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, round_jiffies_relative(edac_dev->delay));
++ else
++ edac_mod_work(&edac_dev->work, edac_dev->delay);
+ }
+
+ int edac_device_alloc_index(void)
+--- a/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
++++ b/drivers/edac/edac_module.h
+@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ bool edac_stop_work(struct delayed_work
+ bool edac_mod_work(struct delayed_work *work, unsigned long delay);
+
+ extern void edac_device_reset_delay_period(struct edac_device_ctl_info
+- *edac_dev, unsigned long value);
++ *edac_dev, unsigned long msec);
+ extern void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value);
+
+ extern void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems);
--- /dev/null
+From fe1f0714385fbcf76b0cbceb02b7277d842014fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
+Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:11:23 +0100
+Subject: x86/resctrl: Fix task CLOSID/RMID update race
+
+From: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
+
+commit fe1f0714385fbcf76b0cbceb02b7277d842014fc upstream.
+
+When the user moves a running task to a new rdtgroup using the task's
+file interface or by deleting its rdtgroup, the resulting change in
+CLOSID/RMID must be immediately propagated to the PQR_ASSOC MSR on the
+task(s) CPUs.
+
+x86 allows reordering loads with prior stores, so if the task starts
+running between a task_curr() check that the CPU hoisted before the
+stores in the CLOSID/RMID update then it can start running with the old
+CLOSID/RMID until it is switched again because __rdtgroup_move_task()
+failed to determine that it needs to be interrupted to obtain the new
+CLOSID/RMID.
+
+Refer to the diagram below:
+
+CPU 0 CPU 1
+----- -----
+__rdtgroup_move_task():
+ curr <- t1->cpu->rq->curr
+ __schedule():
+ rq->curr <- t1
+ resctrl_sched_in():
+ t1->{closid,rmid} -> {1,1}
+ t1->{closid,rmid} <- {2,2}
+ if (curr == t1) // false
+ IPI(t1->cpu)
+
+A similar race impacts rdt_move_group_tasks(), which updates tasks in a
+deleted rdtgroup.
+
+In both cases, use smp_mb() to order the task_struct::{closid,rmid}
+stores before the loads in task_curr(). In particular, in the
+rdt_move_group_tasks() case, simply execute an smp_mb() on every
+iteration with a matching task.
+
+It is possible to use a single smp_mb() in rdt_move_group_tasks(), but
+this would require two passes and a means of remembering which
+task_structs were updated in the first loop. However, benchmarking
+results below showed too little performance impact in the simple
+approach to justify implementing the two-pass approach.
+
+Times below were collected using `perf stat` to measure the time to
+remove a group containing a 1600-task, parallel workload.
+
+CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum P-8136 CPU @ 2.00GHz (112 threads)
+
+ # mkdir /sys/fs/resctrl/test
+ # echo $$ > /sys/fs/resctrl/test/tasks
+ # perf bench sched messaging -g 40 -l 100000
+
+task-clock time ranges collected using:
+
+ # perf stat rmdir /sys/fs/resctrl/test
+
+Baseline: 1.54 - 1.60 ms
+smp_mb() every matching task: 1.57 - 1.67 ms
+
+ [ bp: Massage commit message. ]
+
+Fixes: ae28d1aae48a ("x86/resctrl: Use an IPI instead of task_work_add() to update PQR_ASSOC MSR")
+Fixes: 0efc89be9471 ("x86/intel_rdt: Update task closid immediately on CPU in rmdir and unmount")
+Signed-off-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
+Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
+Reviewed-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
+Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220161123.432120-1-peternewman@google.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 12 +++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
++++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+@@ -580,8 +580,10 @@ static int __rdtgroup_move_task(struct t
+ /*
+ * Ensure the task's closid and rmid are written before determining if
+ * the task is current that will decide if it will be interrupted.
++ * This pairs with the full barrier between the rq->curr update and
++ * resctrl_sched_in() during context switch.
+ */
+- barrier();
++ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * By now, the task's closid and rmid are set. If the task is current
+@@ -2364,6 +2366,14 @@ static void rdt_move_group_tasks(struct
+ WRITE_ONCE(t->rmid, to->mon.rmid);
+
+ /*
++ * Order the closid/rmid stores above before the loads
++ * in task_curr(). This pairs with the full barrier
++ * between the rq->curr update and resctrl_sched_in()
++ * during context switch.
++ */
++ smp_mb();
++
++ /*
+ * If the task is on a CPU, set the CPU in the mask.
+ * The detection is inaccurate as tasks might move or
+ * schedule before the smp function call takes place.