#define PRETTY_FUNCTION ""
#endif
-#define test_assert(expr) tt_assert(expr)
-
#define test_eq(expr1, expr2) tt_int_op((expr1), ==, (expr2))
#define test_streq(expr1, expr2) tt_str_op((expr1), ==, (expr2))
#if 0
/* Try a mask with a wildcard. */
r=tor_addr_parse_mask_ports("*/16",0,&t1, &mask, NULL, NULL);
- test_assert(r == -1);
+ tt_assert(r == -1);
r=tor_addr_parse_mask_ports("*4/16",TAPMP_EXTENDED_STAR,
&t1, &mask, NULL, NULL);
- test_assert(r == -1);
+ tt_assert(r == -1);
r=tor_addr_parse_mask_ports("*6/30",TAPMP_EXTENDED_STAR,
&t1, &mask, NULL, NULL);
- test_assert(r == -1);
+ tt_assert(r == -1);
#endif
/* Basic mask tests*/
r=tor_addr_parse_mask_ports("1.1.2.2/31",0,&t1, &mask, NULL, NULL);
tt_int_op(rp1->bandwidthcapacity,==, r1->bandwidthcapacity);
tt_assert(crypto_pk_cmp_keys(rp1->onion_pkey, pk1) == 0);
tt_assert(crypto_pk_cmp_keys(rp1->identity_pkey, pk2) == 0);
- //test_assert(rp1->exit_policy == NULL);
+ //tt_assert(rp1->exit_policy == NULL);
tor_free(buf);
strlcpy(buf2,
* Didn't expect this, but the old unit test only checked some of them,
* so don't assert.
*/
- /* test_assert(0); */
+ /* tt_assert(0); */
}
done:
tt_assert(con);
tt_assert(!con->cert);
- // test_assert(con->consensus_method >= MIN_METHOD_TO_CLIP_UNMEASURED_BW_KB);
+ // tt_assert(con->consensus_method >= MIN_METHOD_TO_CLIP_UNMEASURED_BW_KB);
tt_assert(con->consensus_method >= 16);
tt_int_op(4,==, smartlist_len(con->routerstatus_list));
/* There should be four listed routers; all voters saw the same in this */
tt_assert(!string_is_key_value(LOG_WARN, "="));
/* ??? */
- /* test_assert(!string_is_key_value(LOG_WARN, "===")); */
+ /* tt_assert(!string_is_key_value(LOG_WARN, "===")); */
done:
;
}