syzbot reported a shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_selector_match()
due to AF_UNSPEC selector with large prefixlen (e.g. 128) matched
against IPv4 flow (when XFRM_STATE_AF_UNSPEC is set).
Fix this by:
- Rejecting mismatched families in xfrm_selector_match.
- Returning false in addr4_match if prefixlen > 32.
- Returning false in addr_match if prefixlen > 128 (prevents overflow).
Fixes: 3f0ab59e6537 ("xfrm: validate new SA's prefixlen using SA family when sel.family is unset")
Reported-by: syzbot+9383b1ff0df4b29ca5e6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/6a2fbe35.be3f099c.2836ae.0018.GAE@google.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
unsigned int pdw;
unsigned int pbi;
+ if (prefixlen > 128)
+ return false;
+
pdw = prefixlen >> 5; /* num of whole u32 in prefix */
pbi = prefixlen & 0x1f; /* num of bits in incomplete u32 in prefix */
/* C99 6.5.7 (3): u32 << 32 is undefined behaviour */
if (sizeof(long) == 4 && prefixlen == 0)
return true;
+
+ if (prefixlen > 32)
+ return false;
+
return !((a1 ^ a2) & htonl(~0UL << (32 - prefixlen)));
}
bool xfrm_selector_match(const struct xfrm_selector *sel, const struct flowi *fl,
unsigned short family)
{
+ if (family != sel->family && sel->family != AF_UNSPEC)
+ return false;
+
switch (family) {
case AF_INET:
return __xfrm4_selector_match(sel, fl);