PR99929 is one of those “how did we get away with this for so long”
bugs: the equality routines weren't checking whether two variable-length
CONST_VECTORs had the same encoding. This meant that:
{ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ... }
would appear to be equal to:
{ 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, ... }
since both are represented using the elements { 1, 0 }.
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/99929
* rtl.h (same_vector_encodings_p): New function.
* cse.c (exp_equiv_p): Check that CONST_VECTORs have the same encoding.
* cselib.c (rtx_equal_for_cselib_1): Likewise.
* jump.c (rtx_renumbered_equal_p): Likewise.
* lra-constraints.c (operands_match_p): Likewise.
* reload.c (operands_match_p): Likewise.
* rtl.c (rtx_equal_p_cb, rtx_equal_p): Likewise.
(cherry picked from commit
a87d3f964df31d4fbceb822c6d293e85c117d992)
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return x == y;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case LABEL_REF:
return label_ref_label (x) == label_ref_label (y);
case DEBUG_EXPR:
return 0;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR:
return DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (x)
== DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (y);
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return 0;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case LABEL_REF:
/* We can't assume nonlocal labels have their following insns yet. */
if (LABEL_REF_NONLOCAL_P (x) || LABEL_REF_NONLOCAL_P (y))
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return false;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case LABEL_REF:
return label_ref_label (x) == label_ref_label (y);
case SYMBOL_REF:
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return 0;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case LABEL_REF:
return label_ref_label (x) == label_ref_label (y);
case SYMBOL_REF:
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return 0;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR:
return DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (x)
== DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (y);
CASE_CONST_UNIQUE:
return 0;
+ case CONST_VECTOR:
+ if (!same_vector_encodings_p (x, y))
+ return false;
+ break;
+
case DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR:
return DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (x)
== DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR_DECL (y);
return const_vec_series_p (x, base_out, step_out);
}
+/* Return true if CONST_VECTORs X and Y, which are known to have the same mode,
+ also have the same encoding. This means that they are equal whenever their
+ operands are equal. */
+
+inline bool
+same_vector_encodings_p (const_rtx x, const_rtx y)
+{
+ /* Don't be fussy about the encoding of constant-length vectors,
+ since XVECEXP (X, 0) and XVECEXP (Y, 0) list all the elements anyway. */
+ if (poly_uint64 (CONST_VECTOR_NUNITS (x)).is_constant ())
+ return true;
+
+ return (CONST_VECTOR_NPATTERNS (x) == CONST_VECTOR_NPATTERNS (y)
+ && (CONST_VECTOR_NELTS_PER_PATTERN (x)
+ == CONST_VECTOR_NELTS_PER_PATTERN (y)));
+}
+
/* Return the unpromoted (outer) mode of SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P subreg X. */
inline scalar_int_mode