6.1-stable patches

added patches:
	fs-fcntl-fix-softirq-unsafe-lock-order-in-fasync-signaling.patch

diff --git a/queue-6.1/fs-fcntl-fix-softirq-unsafe-lock-order-in-fasync-signaling.patch b/queue-6.1/fs-fcntl-fix-softirq-unsafe-lock-order-in-fasync-signaling.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b4b0208
--- /dev/null
+++ b/queue-6.1/fs-fcntl-fix-softirq-unsafe-lock-order-in-fasync-signaling.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+From 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
+Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 21:52:10 +0800
+Subject: fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling
+
+From: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
+
+commit 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71 upstream.
+
+A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in
+send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal.
+
+When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both
+functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list.
+However, they are frequently called from softirq context:
+- send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync
+- send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ)
+
+The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism:
+1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait().
+2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in
+   fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers.
+3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception).
+4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire
+   read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting.
+
+Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already
+RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly
+required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with
+rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the
+single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of
+service vector via TCP URG packets.
+
+Lockdep splat:
+=====================================================
+WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
+[...]
+Chain exists of:
+  &dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock
+
+Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
+       CPU0                    CPU1
+       ----                    ----
+  lock(tasklist_lock);
+                           local_irq_disable();
+                           lock(&dev->event_lock);
+                           lock(&f_owner->lock);
+  <Interrupt>
+    lock(&dev->event_lock);
+
+*** DEADLOCK ***
+
+Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
+Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260523135210.590928-1-w15303746062@163.com
+Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/fcntl.c |    8 ++++----
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/fcntl.c
++++ b/fs/fcntl.c
+@@ -781,11 +781,11 @@ void send_sigio(struct fown_struct *fown
+                       send_sigio_to_task(p, fown, fd, band, type);
+               rcu_read_unlock();
+       } else {
+-              read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
++              rcu_read_lock();
+               do_each_pid_task(pid, type, p) {
+                       send_sigio_to_task(p, fown, fd, band, type);
+               } while_each_pid_task(pid, type, p);
+-              read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
++              rcu_read_unlock();
+       }
+  out_unlock_fown:
+       read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags);
+@@ -822,11 +822,11 @@ int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown
+                       send_sigurg_to_task(p, fown, type);
+               rcu_read_unlock();
+       } else {
+-              read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
++              rcu_read_lock();
+               do_each_pid_task(pid, type, p) {
+                       send_sigurg_to_task(p, fown, type);
+               } while_each_pid_task(pid, type, p);
+-              read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
++              rcu_read_unlock();
+       }
+  out_unlock_fown:
+       read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags);

diff --git a/queue-6.1/series b/queue-6.1/series
index fae6ff975e9fadccb371bf449f62598556674dca..db1649eb75d6ad22c18e8501fc20570cd36a98ce 100644 (file)
--- a/queue-6.1/series
+++ b/queue-6.1/series
@@ -324,3 +324,4 @@ drm-amd-display-clamp-hdmi-hdcp2-rx_id_list-read-to-buffer-size.patch
 drm-amd-display-clamp-vbios-hdmi-retimer-register-count-to-array-size.patch
 drm-amd-display-fix-null-deref-and-buffer-over-read-in-sdp-debugfs.patch
 drm-amd-display-use-krealloc_array-in-dal_vector_reserve.patch
+fs-fcntl-fix-softirq-unsafe-lock-order-in-fasync-signaling.patch