[3.12] gh-115450: Fix direct invocation of `test_desctut` (GH-115451) (#115453)

gh-115450: Fix direct invocation of `test_desctut` (GH-115451)
(cherry picked from commit ec8909a23931338f81803ea3f18dc2073f74a152)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <mail@sobolevn.me>

diff --git a/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py b/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py
index 7796031ed0602f3deb7c2fe70f2cae55373b53b0..9ecc0e4d509e776cdeaf0cc9be3c5cda5bc31ebf 100644 (file)
--- a/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_descrtut.py
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ test_1 = """
 Here's the new type at work:
 
     >>> print(defaultdict)              # show our type
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
+    <class '%(modname)s.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(type(defaultdict))        # its metatype
     <class 'type'>
     >>> a = defaultdict(default=0.0)    # create an instance
     >>> print(a)                        # show the instance
     {}
     >>> print(type(a))                  # show its type
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
+    <class '%(modname)s.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(a.__class__)              # show its class
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
+    <class '%(modname)s.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(type(a) is a.__class__)   # its type is its class
     True
     >>> a[1] = 3.25                     # modify the instance
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ just like classic classes:
     >>> print(sortdict(a.__dict__))
     {'default': -1000, 'x1': 100, 'x2': 200}
     >>>
-"""
+""" % {'modname': __name__}
 
 class defaultdict2(dict):
     __slots__ = ['default']
@@ -264,19 +264,19 @@ implicit first argument that is the *class* for which they are invoked.
     ...         print("classmethod", cls, y)
 
     >>> C.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.C'> 1
     >>> c = C()
     >>> c.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.C'> 1
 
     >>> class D(C):
     ...     pass
 
     >>> D.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.D'> 1
     >>> d = D()
     >>> d.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.D'> 1
 
 This prints "classmethod __main__.D 1" both times; in other words, the
 class passed as the first argument of foo() is the class involved in the
@@ -292,18 +292,18 @@ But notice this:
 
     >>> E.foo(1)
     E.foo() called
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.C'> 1
     >>> e = E()
     >>> e.foo(1)
     E.foo() called
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
+    classmethod <class '%(modname)s.C'> 1
 
 In this example, the call to C.foo() from E.foo() will see class C as its
 first argument, not class E. This is to be expected, since the call
 specifies the class C. But it stresses the difference between these class
 methods and methods defined in metaclasses (where an upcall to a metamethod
 would pass the target class as an explicit first argument).
-"""
+""" % {'modname': __name__}
 
 test_5 = """