r16928@tombo: nickm | 2008-07-11 17:07:36 -0400

 It seems that fixing one spelling error always means that somebody is about to tell me about another.  Fix a second spelling error in the risks section of 150.

svn:r15848

diff --git a/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt b/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt
index 3d2b1382e92190cdff7d5cefae9d5c7328862f7a..f90d8a25fcc4fae6d58e60a9b7723414f5497e77 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt
+++ b/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Risks:
 
    Use of this option can make users partitionable under certain attack
    assumptions.  However, ExitNodes already creates this possibility,
-   so there isn't much increased risk in ExcludeExitNods.
+   so there isn't much increased risk in ExcludeExitNodes.
 
    We should still encourage people who exclude an exit node because
    of bad behavior to report it instead of just adding it to their