--- /dev/null
+From 8f9c91273e36e5762c617c23e4fd48d5172e0dac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
+Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:36:16 +0000
+Subject: ACPICA: Do not repair _TSS return package if _PSS is present
+
+From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
+
+commit 8f9c91273e36e5762c617c23e4fd48d5172e0dac upstream.
+
+We can only sort the _TSS return package if there is no _PSS
+in the same scope. This is because if _PSS is present, the ACPI
+specification dictates that the _TSS Power Dissipation field is
+to be ignored, and therefore some BIOSs leave garbage values in
+the _TSS Power field(s). In this case, it is best to just return
+the _TSS package as-is.
+
+Reported-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+
+---
+ drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 1 +
+ drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c | 1 +
+ drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
+ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
++++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
+@@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ struct acpi_predefined_data {
+ char *pathname;
+ const union acpi_predefined_info *predefined;
+ union acpi_operand_object *parent_package;
++ struct acpi_namespace_node *node;
+ u32 flags;
+ u8 node_flags;
+ };
+--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c
++++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nspredef.c
+@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ acpi_ns_check_predefined_names(struct ac
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ data->predefined = predefined;
++ data->node = node;
+ data->node_flags = node->flags;
+ data->pathname = pathname;
+
+--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c
++++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsrepair2.c
+@@ -503,6 +503,21 @@ acpi_ns_repair_TSS(struct acpi_predefine
+ {
+ union acpi_operand_object *return_object = *return_object_ptr;
+ acpi_status status;
++ struct acpi_namespace_node *node;
++
++ /*
++ * We can only sort the _TSS return package if there is no _PSS in the
++ * same scope. This is because if _PSS is present, the ACPI specification
++ * dictates that the _TSS Power Dissipation field is to be ignored, and
++ * therefore some BIOSs leave garbage values in the _TSS Power field(s).
++ * In this case, it is best to just return the _TSS package as-is.
++ * (May, 2011)
++ */
++ status =
++ acpi_ns_get_node(data->node, "^_PSS", ACPI_NS_NO_UPSEARCH, &node);
++ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
++ return (AE_OK);
++ }
+
+ status = acpi_ns_check_sorted_list(data, return_object, 5, 1,
+ ACPI_SORT_DESCENDING,