George Kadianakis notes that if you give crypto_rand_int() a value
above INT_MAX, it can return a negative number, which is not what
the documentation would imply.
The simple solution is to assert that the input is in [1,INT_MAX+1].
If in the future we need a random-value function that can return
values up to UINT_MAX, we can add one.
Fixes bug 3306; bugfix on 0.2.2pre14.
--- /dev/null
+ o Minor bugfixes:
+ - Make our crypto_rand_int() function check the value of its input
+ correctly. Previously, it accepted values up to UINT_MAX, but
+ could return a negative number if given a value above INT_MAX+1.
+ Found by George Kadianakis. Fixes bug 3306; bugfix on 0.2.2pre14.
}
/** Return a pseudorandom integer, chosen uniformly from the values
- * between 0 and <b>max</b>-1. */
+ * between 0 and <b>max</b>-1 inclusive. <b>max</b> must be between 1 and
+ * INT_MAX+1, inclusive. */
int
crypto_rand_int(unsigned int max)
{
unsigned int val;
unsigned int cutoff;
- tor_assert(max < UINT_MAX);
+ tor_assert(max <= ((unsigned int)INT_MAX)+1);
tor_assert(max > 0); /* don't div by 0 */
/* We ignore any values that are >= 'cutoff,' to avoid biasing the