> why would it need an anonymized connection?

> ah.
> yes, i think you're right. i was thinking 3-hop, but i think it is 1-hop.

svn:r15235

diff --git a/src/or/connection_edge.c b/src/or/connection_edge.c
index 964824c15e61bf908f06c2955af8da0763f89a1d..43d4c1e80b63ed995d10eea8740e45bd92f0e108 100644 (file)
--- a/src/or/connection_edge.c
+++ b/src/or/connection_edge.c
@@ -2109,8 +2109,8 @@ connection_ap_make_link(char *address, uint16_t port,
 {
   edge_connection_t *conn;
 
-  log_info(LD_APP,"Making internal anonymized tunnel to %s:%d ...",
-           safe_str(address),port);
+  log_info(LD_APP,"Making internal %s tunnel to %s:%d ...",
+           want_onehop ? "direct" : "anonymized" , safe_str(address),port);
 
   conn = TO_EDGE_CONN(connection_new(CONN_TYPE_AP, AF_INET));
   conn->_base.linked = 1; /* so that we can add it safely below. */