Eduard Zingerman says:
====================
bpf: Fix u32/s32 bounds when ranges cross min/max boundary
Cover the following cases in range refinement logic for 32-bit ranges:
- s32 range crosses U32_MAX/0 boundary, positive part of the s32 range
overlaps with u32 range.
- s32 range crosses U32_MAX/0 boundary, negative part of the s32 range
overlaps with u32 range.
These cases are already handled for 64-bit range refinement.
Without the fix the test in patch 2 is rejected by the verifier.
The test was reduced from sched-ext program.
Changelog:
- v2 -> v3:
- Reverted
da653de268d3 (Paul)
- Removed !BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS flag from
crossing_32_bit_signed_boundary_2() (Paul)
- v1 -> v2:
- Extended commit message and comments (Emil)
- Targeting 'bpf' tree instead of bpf-next (Alexei)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/
9a23fbacdc6d33ec8fcb3f6988395b5129f75369.camel@gmail.com/T
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/
20260305-bpf-32-bit-range-overflow-v2-0-
7169206a3041@gmail.com/
---
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260306-bpf-32-bit-range-overflow-v3-0-f7f67e060a6b@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>