]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/stable-queue.git/commitdiff
4.19-stable patches
authorGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:33:27 +0000 (13:33 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:33:27 +0000 (13:33 +0200)
added patches:
net-rose-fix-uaf-bugs-caused-by-timer-handler.patch
sunrpc-fix-read_plus-crasher.patch

queue-4.19/net-rose-fix-uaf-bugs-caused-by-timer-handler.patch [new file with mode: 0644]
queue-4.19/series
queue-4.19/sunrpc-fix-read_plus-crasher.patch [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/queue-4.19/net-rose-fix-uaf-bugs-caused-by-timer-handler.patch b/queue-4.19/net-rose-fix-uaf-bugs-caused-by-timer-handler.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1da68de
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+From 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
+Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:26:40 +0800
+Subject: net: rose: fix UAF bugs caused by timer handler
+
+From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
+
+commit 9cc02ede696272c5271a401e4f27c262359bc2f6 upstream.
+
+There are UAF bugs in rose_heartbeat_expiry(), rose_timer_expiry()
+and rose_idletimer_expiry(). The root cause is that del_timer()
+could not stop the timer handler that is running and the refcount
+of sock is not managed properly.
+
+One of the UAF bugs is shown below:
+
+    (thread 1)          |        (thread 2)
+                        |  rose_bind
+                        |  rose_connect
+                        |    rose_start_heartbeat
+rose_release            |    (wait a time)
+  case ROSE_STATE_0     |
+  rose_destroy_socket   |  rose_heartbeat_expiry
+    rose_stop_heartbeat |
+    sock_put(sk)        |    ...
+  sock_put(sk) // FREE  |
+                        |    bh_lock_sock(sk) // USE
+
+The sock is deallocated by sock_put() in rose_release() and
+then used by bh_lock_sock() in rose_heartbeat_expiry().
+
+Although rose_destroy_socket() calls rose_stop_heartbeat(),
+it could not stop the timer that is running.
+
+The KASAN report triggered by POC is shown below:
+
+BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
+Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800ae59098 by task swapper/3/0
+...
+Call Trace:
+ <IRQ>
+ dump_stack_lvl+0xbf/0xee
+ print_address_description+0x7b/0x440
+ print_report+0x101/0x230
+ ? irq_work_single+0xbb/0x140
+ ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
+ kasan_report+0xed/0x120
+ ? _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
+ kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
+ _raw_spin_lock+0x5a/0x110
+ rose_heartbeat_expiry+0x39/0x370
+ ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
+ call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x1c0
+ ? rose_start_heartbeat+0xb0/0xb0
+ expire_timers+0x1f3/0x320
+ __run_timers+0x3ff/0x4d0
+ run_timer_softirq+0x41/0x80
+ __do_softirq+0x233/0x544
+ irq_exit_rcu+0x41/0xa0
+ sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0xb0
+ </IRQ>
+ <TASK>
+ asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
+RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x10
+RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012fea0 EFLAGS: 00000202
+RAX: 000000000000bcae RBX: ffff888006660f00 RCX: 000000000000bcae
+RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff843a11c0 RDI: ffffffff843a1180
+RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffed100da36d46
+R10: dfffe9100da36d47 R11: ffffffff83cf0950 R12: 0000000000000000
+R13: 1ffff11000ccc1e0 R14: ffffffff8542af28 R15: dffffc0000000000
+...
+Allocated by task 146:
+ __kasan_kmalloc+0xc4/0xf0
+ sk_prot_alloc+0xdd/0x1a0
+ sk_alloc+0x2d/0x4e0
+ rose_create+0x7b/0x330
+ __sock_create+0x2dd/0x640
+ __sys_socket+0xc7/0x270
+ __x64_sys_socket+0x71/0x80
+ do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
+ entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
+
+Freed by task 152:
+ kasan_set_track+0x4c/0x70
+ kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40
+ ____kasan_slab_free+0x124/0x190
+ kfree+0xd3/0x270
+ __sk_destruct+0x314/0x460
+ rose_release+0x2fa/0x3b0
+ sock_close+0xcb/0x230
+ __fput+0x2d9/0x650
+ task_work_run+0xd6/0x160
+ exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xc7/0xd0
+ exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x4e/0x80
+ syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
+ do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x90
+ entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
+
+This patch adds refcount of sock when we use functions
+such as rose_start_heartbeat() and so on to start timer,
+and decreases the refcount of sock when timer is finished
+or deleted by functions such as rose_stop_heartbeat()
+and so on. As a result, the UAF bugs could be mitigated.
+
+Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
+Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
+Tested-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629002640.5693-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn
+Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ net/rose/rose_timer.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
+ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/net/rose/rose_timer.c
++++ b/net/rose/rose_timer.c
+@@ -34,89 +34,89 @@ static void rose_idletimer_expiry(struct
+ void rose_start_heartbeat(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+-      del_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+       sk->sk_timer.function = rose_heartbeat_expiry;
+       sk->sk_timer.expires  = jiffies + 5 * HZ;
+-      add_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
++      sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, sk->sk_timer.expires);
+ }
+ void rose_start_t1timer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+       struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
+-      del_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose->timer);
+       rose->timer.function = rose_timer_expiry;
+       rose->timer.expires  = jiffies + rose->t1;
+-      add_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_reset_timer(sk, &rose->timer, rose->timer.expires);
+ }
+ void rose_start_t2timer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+       struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
+-      del_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose->timer);
+       rose->timer.function = rose_timer_expiry;
+       rose->timer.expires  = jiffies + rose->t2;
+-      add_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_reset_timer(sk, &rose->timer, rose->timer.expires);
+ }
+ void rose_start_t3timer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+       struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
+-      del_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose->timer);
+       rose->timer.function = rose_timer_expiry;
+       rose->timer.expires  = jiffies + rose->t3;
+-      add_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_reset_timer(sk, &rose->timer, rose->timer.expires);
+ }
+ void rose_start_hbtimer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+       struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
+-      del_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose->timer);
+       rose->timer.function = rose_timer_expiry;
+       rose->timer.expires  = jiffies + rose->hb;
+-      add_timer(&rose->timer);
++      sk_reset_timer(sk, &rose->timer, rose->timer.expires);
+ }
+ void rose_start_idletimer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+       struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
+-      del_timer(&rose->idletimer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose->idletimer);
+       if (rose->idle > 0) {
+               rose->idletimer.function = rose_idletimer_expiry;
+               rose->idletimer.expires  = jiffies + rose->idle;
+-              add_timer(&rose->idletimer);
++              sk_reset_timer(sk, &rose->idletimer, rose->idletimer.expires);
+       }
+ }
+ void rose_stop_heartbeat(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+-      del_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+ }
+ void rose_stop_timer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+-      del_timer(&rose_sk(sk)->timer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose_sk(sk)->timer);
+ }
+ void rose_stop_idletimer(struct sock *sk)
+ {
+-      del_timer(&rose_sk(sk)->idletimer);
++      sk_stop_timer(sk, &rose_sk(sk)->idletimer);
+ }
+ static void rose_heartbeat_expiry(struct timer_list *t)
+@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static void rose_heartbeat_expiry(struct
+                   (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))) {
+                       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+                       rose_destroy_socket(sk);
++                      sock_put(sk);
+                       return;
+               }
+               break;
+@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ static void rose_heartbeat_expiry(struct
+       rose_start_heartbeat(sk);
+       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
++      sock_put(sk);
+ }
+ static void rose_timer_expiry(struct timer_list *t)
+@@ -184,6 +186,7 @@ static void rose_timer_expiry(struct tim
+               break;
+       }
+       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
++      sock_put(sk);
+ }
+ static void rose_idletimer_expiry(struct timer_list *t)
+@@ -208,4 +211,5 @@ static void rose_idletimer_expiry(struct
+               sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
+       }
+       bh_unlock_sock(sk);
++      sock_put(sk);
+ }
index 5848dacc03cca36fd02f1c1d43d71d4155643ca9..10d697ba77c399db51923a31d87ab7de690dc357 100644 (file)
@@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ nvdimm-fix-badblocks-clear-off-by-one-error.patch
 dm-raid-fix-accesses-beyond-end-of-raid-member-array.patch
 dm-raid-fix-kasan-warning-in-raid5_add_disks.patch
 s390-archrandom-simplify-back-to-earlier-design-and-initialize-earlier.patch
+sunrpc-fix-read_plus-crasher.patch
+net-rose-fix-uaf-bugs-caused-by-timer-handler.patch
diff --git a/queue-4.19/sunrpc-fix-read_plus-crasher.patch b/queue-4.19/sunrpc-fix-read_plus-crasher.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ff2338c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+From a23dd544debcda4ee4a549ec7de59e85c3c8345c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
+Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:48:18 -0400
+Subject: SUNRPC: Fix READ_PLUS crasher
+
+From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
+
+commit a23dd544debcda4ee4a549ec7de59e85c3c8345c upstream.
+
+Looks like there are still cases when "space_left - frag1bytes" can
+legitimately exceed PAGE_SIZE. Ensure that xdr->end always remains
+within the current encode buffer.
+
+Reported-by: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
+Reported-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
+Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216151
+Fixes: 6c254bf3b637 ("SUNRPC: Fix the calculation of xdr->end in xdr_get_next_encode_buffer()")
+Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ net/sunrpc/xdr.c |    2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
++++ b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
+@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static __be32 *xdr_get_next_encode_buffe
+        */
+       xdr->p = (void *)p + frag2bytes;
+       space_left = xdr->buf->buflen - xdr->buf->len;
+-      if (space_left - nbytes >= PAGE_SIZE)
++      if (space_left - frag1bytes >= PAGE_SIZE)
+               xdr->end = (void *)p + PAGE_SIZE;
+       else
+               xdr->end = (void *)p + space_left - frag1bytes;