+2008-08-30 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
+
+ * ipa-inline.c (cgraph_estimate_growth): Discover self recursive
+ functions.
+ (cgraph_decide_inlining_of_small_function): Use edge->count to detect
+ profile presence locally.
+
2008-08-29 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
PR bootstrap/37086
{
int growth = 0;
struct cgraph_edge *e;
+ bool self_recursive = false;
+
if (node->global.estimated_growth != INT_MIN)
return node->global.estimated_growth;
for (e = node->callers; e; e = e->next_caller)
- if (e->inline_failed)
- growth += (cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining (1, e->caller, node)
- - e->caller->global.insns);
+ {
+ if (e->caller == node)
+ self_recursive = true;
+ if (e->inline_failed)
+ growth += (cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining (1, e->caller, node)
+ - e->caller->global.insns);
+ }
- /* ??? Wrong for self recursive functions or cases where we decide to not
- inline for different reasons, but it is not big deal as in that case
- we will keep the body around, but we will also avoid some inlining. */
- if (!node->needed && !DECL_EXTERNAL (node->decl))
+ /* ??? Wrong for non-trivially self recursive functions or cases where
+ we decide to not inline for different reasons, but it is not big deal
+ as in that case we will keep the body around, but we will also avoid
+ some inlining. */
+ if (!node->needed && !DECL_EXTERNAL (node->decl) && !self_recursive)
growth -= node->global.insns;
node->global.estimated_growth = growth;
is not good idea so prohibit the recursive inlining.
??? When the frequencies are taken into account we might not need this
- restriction. */
- if (!max_count)
+ restriction.
+
+ We need to be cureful here, in some testcases, e.g. directivec.c in
+ libcpp, we can estimate self recursive function to have negative growth
+ for inlining completely.
+ */
+ if (!edge->count)
{
where = edge->caller;
while (where->global.inlined_to)