Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
calls v_d_e_p on each operand of the NEW_EXPR. Since one of them
is a type, we crash on the new assert in t_d_e_p.
t_d_e_p has code to handle {,VEC_}NEW_EXPR, which at this point
was already performed, so I think we can handle these two codes
specifically and skip the second operand, which is always going
to be a type.
PR c++/105803
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (value_dependent_expression_p): Handle {,VEC_}NEW_EXPR
in the switch.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/new13.C: New test.
under instantiate_non_dependent_expr; it can't be constant. */
return true;
+ case NEW_EXPR:
+ case VEC_NEW_EXPR:
+ /* The second operand is a type, which type_dependent_expression_p
+ (and therefore value_dependent_expression_p) doesn't want to see. */
+ return (value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 0))
+ || value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 2))
+ || value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 3)));
+
default:
/* A constant expression is value-dependent if any subexpression is
value-dependent. */
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/105803
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fchecking=2" }
+
+namespace std {
+template <typename> class shared_ptr {};
+}
+struct S {};
+template <int> void build_matrices() {
+ std::shared_ptr<S>(new S);
+}