.. include:: pending-removal-in-3.16.rst
+.. include:: pending-removal-in-3.17.rst
+
.. include:: pending-removal-in-future.rst
C API Deprecations
--- /dev/null
+Pending removal in Python 3.17
+------------------------------
+
+* :mod:`collections.abc`:
+
+ - :class:`collections.abc.ByteString` is scheduled for removal in Python 3.17.
+
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj``
+ implements the :ref:`buffer protocol <bufferobjects>` at runtime. For use
+ in type annotations, either use :class:`~collections.abc.Buffer` or a union
+ that explicitly specifies the types your code supports (e.g.,
+ ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
+
+ :class:`!ByteString` was originally intended to be an abstract class that
+ would serve as a supertype of both :class:`bytes` and :class:`bytearray`.
+ However, since the ABC never had any methods, knowing that an object was an
+ instance of :class:`!ByteString` never actually told you anything useful
+ about the object. Other common buffer types such as :class:`memoryview`
+ were also never understood as subtypes of :class:`!ByteString` (either at
+ runtime or by static type checkers).
+
+ See :pep:`PEP 688 <688#current-options>` for more details.
+ (Contributed by Shantanu Jain in :gh:`91896`.)
+
+
+* :mod:`typing`:
+
+ - Before Python 3.14, old-style unions were implemented using the private class
+ ``typing._UnionGenericAlias``. This class is no longer needed for the implementation,
+ but it has been retained for backward compatibility, with removal scheduled for Python
+ 3.17. Users should use documented introspection helpers like :func:`typing.get_origin`
+ and :func:`typing.get_args` instead of relying on private implementation details.
+ - :class:`typing.ByteString`, deprecated since Python 3.9, is scheduled for removal in
+ Python 3.17.
+
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj``
+ implements the :ref:`buffer protocol <bufferobjects>` at runtime. For use
+ in type annotations, either use :class:`~collections.abc.Buffer` or a union
+ that explicitly specifies the types your code supports (e.g.,
+ ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
+
+ :class:`!ByteString` was originally intended to be an abstract class that
+ would serve as a supertype of both :class:`bytes` and :class:`bytearray`.
+ However, since the ABC never had any methods, knowing that an object was an
+ instance of :class:`!ByteString` never actually told you anything useful
+ about the object. Other common buffer types such as :class:`memoryview`
+ were also never understood as subtypes of :class:`!ByteString` (either at
+ runtime or by static type checkers).
+
+ See :pep:`PEP 688 <688#current-options>` for more details.
+ (Contributed by Shantanu Jain in :gh:`91896`.)
The :meth:`~sequence.index` method gained support for
the *stop* and *start* arguments.
- .. deprecated-removed:: 3.12 3.14
+ .. deprecated-removed:: 3.12 3.17
The :class:`ByteString` ABC has been deprecated.
- For use in typing, prefer a union, like ``bytes | bytearray``, or
- :class:`collections.abc.Buffer`.
- For use as an ABC, prefer :class:`Sequence` or :class:`collections.abc.Buffer`.
+
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj``
+ implements the :ref:`buffer protocol <bufferobjects>` at runtime. For use
+ in type annotations, either use :class:`Buffer` or a union that
+ explicitly specifies the types your code supports (e.g.,
+ ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
+
+ :class:`!ByteString` was originally intended to be an abstract class that
+ would serve as a supertype of both :class:`bytes` and :class:`bytearray`.
+ However, since the ABC never had any methods, knowing that an object was
+ an instance of :class:`!ByteString` never actually told you anything
+ useful about the object. Other common buffer types such as
+ :class:`memoryview` were also never understood as subtypes of
+ :class:`!ByteString` (either at runtime or by static type checkers).
+
+ See :pep:`PEP 688 <688#current-options>` for more details.
.. class:: Set
MutableSet
.. class:: ByteString(Sequence[int])
- This type represents the types :class:`bytes`, :class:`bytearray`,
- and :class:`memoryview` of byte sequences.
+ Deprecated alias to :class:`collections.abc.ByteString`.
- .. deprecated-removed:: 3.9 3.14
- Prefer :class:`collections.abc.Buffer`, or a union like ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``.
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj``
+ implements the :ref:`buffer protocol <bufferobjects>` at runtime. For use in
+ type annotations, either use :class:`~collections.abc.Buffer` or a union
+ that explicitly specifies the types your code supports (e.g.,
+ ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
+
+ :class:`!ByteString` was originally intended to be an abstract class that
+ would serve as a supertype of both :class:`bytes` and :class:`bytearray`.
+ However, since the ABC never had any methods, knowing that an object was an
+ instance of :class:`!ByteString` never actually told you anything useful
+ about the object. Other common buffer types such as :class:`memoryview` were
+ also never understood as subtypes of :class:`!ByteString` (either at runtime
+ or by static type checkers).
+
+ See :pep:`PEP 688 <688#current-options>` for more details.
+
+ .. deprecated-removed:: 3.9 3.17
.. class:: Collection(Sized, Iterable[T_co], Container[T_co])
(Contributed by Prince Roshan in :gh:`103636`.)
* :mod:`collections.abc`: Deprecated :class:`collections.abc.ByteString`.
- Prefer :class:`Sequence` or :class:`collections.abc.Buffer`.
- For use in typing, prefer a union, like ``bytes | bytearray``, or :class:`collections.abc.Buffer`.
+
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj`` implements
+ the :ref:`buffer protocol <bufferobjects>` at runtime. For use in type
+ annotations, either use :class:`~collections.abc.Buffer` or a union
+ that explicitly specifies the types your code supports (e.g.,
+ ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
+
+ :class:`!ByteString` was originally intended to be an abstract class that
+ would serve as a supertype of both :class:`bytes` and :class:`bytearray`.
+ However, since the ABC never had any methods, knowing that an object was an
+ instance of :class:`!ByteString` never actually told you anything useful
+ about the object. Other common buffer types such as :class:`memoryview` were
+ also never understood as subtypes of :class:`!ByteString` (either at
+ runtime or by static type checkers).
+
+ See :pep:`PEP 688 <688#current-options>` for more details.
(Contributed by Shantanu Jain in :gh:`91896`.)
* :mod:`datetime`: :class:`datetime.datetime`'s :meth:`~datetime.datetime.utcnow` and
.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.16.rst
+.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.17.rst
+
.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-future.rst
.. _whatsnew312-removed:
.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.16.rst
+.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-3.17.rst
+
.. include:: ../deprecations/pending-removal-in-future.rst
CPython Bytecode Changes
return super().__instancecheck__(instance)
class ByteString(Sequence, metaclass=_DeprecateByteStringMeta):
- """This unifies bytes and bytearray.
+ """Deprecated ABC serving as a common supertype of ``bytes`` and ``bytearray``.
- XXX Should add all their methods.
+ This ABC is scheduled for removal in Python 3.17.
+ Use ``isinstance(obj, collections.abc.Buffer)`` to test if ``obj``
+ implements the buffer protocol at runtime. For use in type annotations,
+ either use ``Buffer`` or a union that explicitly specifies the types your
+ code supports (e.g., ``bytes | bytearray | memoryview``).
"""
__slots__ = ()