--- /dev/null
+From 9ad36309e2719a884f946678e0296be10f0bb4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
+Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:05:18 -0300
+Subject: net_sched: cls_route: remove from list when handle is 0
+
+From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
+
+commit 9ad36309e2719a884f946678e0296be10f0bb4c1 upstream.
+
+When a route filter is replaced and the old filter has a 0 handle, the old
+one won't be removed from the hashtable, while it will still be freed.
+
+The test was there since before commit 1109c00547fc ("net: sched: RCU
+cls_route"), when a new filter was not allocated when there was an old one.
+The old filter was reused and the reinserting would only be necessary if an
+old filter was replaced. That was still wrong for the same case where the
+old handle was 0.
+
+Remove the old filter from the list independently from its handle value.
+
+This fixes CVE-2022-2588, also reported as ZDI-CAN-17440.
+
+Reported-by: Zhenpeng Lin <zplin@u.northwestern.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
+Reviewed-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809170518.164662-1-cascardo@canonical.com
+Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ net/sched/cls_route.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/net/sched/cls_route.c
++++ b/net/sched/cls_route.c
+@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int route4_change(struct net *net
+ rcu_assign_pointer(f->next, f1);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*fp, f);
+
+- if (fold && fold->handle && f->handle != fold->handle) {
++ if (fold) {
+ th = to_hash(fold->handle);
+ h = from_hash(fold->handle >> 16);
+ b = rtnl_dereference(head->table[th]);