--- /dev/null
+From 51135a4a413ef6ca904a051718c7f0b4dd62055a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 14:32:54 +0100
+Subject: ACPI: button: Add DMI quirk for Medion Akoya E2228T
+
+From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit 7daaa06357bf7f1874b62bb1ea9d66a51d4e567e ]
+
+The Medion Akoya E2228T's ACPI _LID implementation is quite broken,
+it has the same issues as the one from the Medion Akoya E2215T:
+
+1. For notifications it uses an ActiveLow Edge GpioInt, rather then
+ an ActiveBoth one, meaning that the device is only notified when the
+ lid is closed, not when it is opened.
+
+2. Matching with this its _LID method simply always returns 0 (closed)
+
+In order for the Linux LID code to work properly with this implementation,
+the lid_init_state selection needs to be set to ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
+add a DMI quirk for this.
+
+While working on this I also found out that the MD60### part of the model
+number differs per country/batch while all of the E2215T and E2228T models
+have this issue, so also remove the " MD60198" part from the E2215T quirk.
+
+Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/acpi/button.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
+index f43f5adc21b61..abf101451c929 100644
+--- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
++++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
+@@ -98,7 +98,18 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id lid_blacklst[] = {
+ */
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "MEDION"),
+- DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2215T MD60198"),
++ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2215T"),
++ },
++ .driver_data = (void *)(long)ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
++ },
++ {
++ /*
++ * Medion Akoya E2228T, notification of the LID device only
++ * happens on close, not on open and _LID always returns closed.
++ */
++ .matches = {
++ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "MEDION"),
++ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "E2228T"),
+ },
+ .driver_data = (void *)(long)ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN,
+ },
+--
+2.27.0
+
--- /dev/null
+From c54efa63e0bcd19408b41777ff3cb980cb7f8595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:57:55 +0000
+Subject: arm64: psci: Avoid printing in cpu_psci_cpu_die()
+
+From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+
+[ Upstream commit 891deb87585017d526b67b59c15d38755b900fea ]
+
+cpu_psci_cpu_die() is called in the context of the dying CPU, which
+will no longer be online or tracked by RCU. It is therefore not generally
+safe to call printk() if the PSCI "cpu off" request fails, so remove the
+pr_crit() invocation.
+
+Cc: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
+Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
+Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106103602.9849-2-will@kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 5 +----
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
+index 3856d51c645b5..3ebb2a56e5f7b 100644
+--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
++++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
+@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
+
+ static void cpu_psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
+ {
+- int ret;
+ /*
+ * There are no known implementations of PSCI actually using the
+ * power state field, pass a sensible default for now.
+@@ -77,9 +76,7 @@ static void cpu_psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
+ u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN <<
+ PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT;
+
+- ret = psci_ops.cpu_off(state);
+-
+- pr_crit("unable to power off CPU%u (%d)\n", cpu, ret);
++ psci_ops.cpu_off(state);
+ }
+
+ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
+--
+2.27.0
+
--- /dev/null
+From b060cc7dfb0c6e7227358c8dd77221683d3c65e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:37:30 +0800
+Subject: pinctrl: rockchip: enable gpio pclk for rockchip_gpio_to_irq
+
+From: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit 63fbf8013b2f6430754526ef9594f229c7219b1f ]
+
+There need to enable pclk_gpio when do irq_create_mapping, since it will
+do access to gpio controller.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
+Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
+Reviewed-by: Kever Yang<kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201013063731.3618-3-jay.xu@rock-chips.com
+Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 2 ++
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+index 005df24f5b3f1..4d3b62707524a 100644
+--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
++++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+@@ -2778,7 +2778,9 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
+ if (!bank->domain)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
++ clk_enable(bank->clk);
+ virq = irq_create_mapping(bank->domain, offset);
++ clk_disable(bank->clk);
+
+ return (virq) ? : -ENXIO;
+ }
+--
+2.27.0
+
--- /dev/null
+From c1c983ddaca745f98a2f3db1ffba060fa164c6d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:24:39 -0800
+Subject: scsi: ufs: Fix unbalanced scsi_block_reqs_cnt caused by ufshcd_hold()
+
+From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
+
+[ Upstream commit da3fecb0040324c08f1587e5bff1f15f36be1872 ]
+
+The scsi_block_reqs_cnt increased in ufshcd_hold() is supposed to be
+decreased back in ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way. However, if
+specific ufshcd_hold/release sequences are met, it is possible that
+scsi_block_reqs_cnt is increased twice but only one ungate work is
+queued. To make sure scsi_block_reqs_cnt is handled by ufshcd_hold() and
+ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way, increase it only if queue_work()
+returns true.
+
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604384682-15837-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org
+Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su <hongwus@codeaurora.org>
+Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
+Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
+Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
+Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+index b2cbdd01ab10b..a63119c35fde8 100644
+--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
++++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+@@ -1592,12 +1592,12 @@ int ufshcd_hold(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool async)
+ * work and to enable clocks.
+ */
+ case CLKS_OFF:
+- ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
+ hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_ON;
+ trace_ufshcd_clk_gating(dev_name(hba->dev),
+ hba->clk_gating.state);
+- queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
+- &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work);
++ if (queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
++ &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work))
++ ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
+ /*
+ * fall through to check if we should wait for this
+ * work to be done or not.
+--
+2.27.0
+
--- /dev/null
+From 98cb859f3a31f10d35a3c0071186ddff5816c327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:47:13 -0700
+Subject: selftests: kvm: Fix the segment descriptor layout to match the actual
+ layout
+
+From: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit df11f7dd5834146defa448acba097e8d7703cc42 ]
+
+Fix the layout of 'struct desc64' to match the layout described in the
+SDM Vol 3, Chapter 3 "Protected-Mode Memory Management", section 3.4.5
+"Segment Descriptors", Figure 3-8 "Segment Descriptor". The test added
+later in this series relies on this and crashes if this layout is not
+correct.
+
+Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
+Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
+Message-Id: <20201012194716.3950330-2-aaronlewis@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86.h | 2 +-
+ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86.c | 3 ++-
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86.h
+index 42c3596815b83..a7667a613bbc7 100644
+--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86.h
++++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86.h
+@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ enum x86_register {
+ struct desc64 {
+ uint16_t limit0;
+ uint16_t base0;
+- unsigned base1:8, s:1, type:4, dpl:2, p:1;
++ unsigned base1:8, type:4, s:1, dpl:2, p:1;
+ unsigned limit1:4, avl:1, l:1, db:1, g:1, base2:8;
+ uint32_t base3;
+ uint32_t zero1;
+diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86.c
+index 4d35eba73dc97..800fe36064f9a 100644
+--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86.c
++++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86.c
+@@ -449,11 +449,12 @@ static void kvm_seg_fill_gdt_64bit(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_segment *segp)
+ desc->limit0 = segp->limit & 0xFFFF;
+ desc->base0 = segp->base & 0xFFFF;
+ desc->base1 = segp->base >> 16;
+- desc->s = segp->s;
+ desc->type = segp->type;
++ desc->s = segp->s;
+ desc->dpl = segp->dpl;
+ desc->p = segp->present;
+ desc->limit1 = segp->limit >> 16;
++ desc->avl = segp->avl;
+ desc->l = segp->l;
+ desc->db = segp->db;
+ desc->g = segp->g;
+--
+2.27.0
+
net-usb-qmi_wwan-set-dtr-quirk-for-mr400.patch
net-ncsi-fix-netlink-registration.patch
net-ftgmac100-fix-crash-when-removing-driver.patch
+pinctrl-rockchip-enable-gpio-pclk-for-rockchip_gpio_.patch
+scsi-ufs-fix-unbalanced-scsi_block_reqs_cnt-caused-b.patch
+selftests-kvm-fix-the-segment-descriptor-layout-to-m.patch
+acpi-button-add-dmi-quirk-for-medion-akoya-e2228t.patch
+arm64-psci-avoid-printing-in-cpu_psci_cpu_die.patch
+vfs-remove-lockdep-bogosity-in-__sb_start_write.patch
--- /dev/null
+From f5525d140edbc067e13eb442252949040a45fbfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:49:29 -0800
+Subject: vfs: remove lockdep bogosity in __sb_start_write
+
+From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit 22843291efc986ce7722610073fcf85a39b4cb13 ]
+
+__sb_start_write has some weird looking lockdep code that claims to
+exist to handle nested freeze locking requests from xfs. The code as
+written seems broken -- if we think we hold a read lock on any of the
+higher freeze levels (e.g. we hold SB_FREEZE_WRITE and are trying to
+lock SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT), it converts a blocking lock attempt into a
+trylock.
+
+However, it's not correct to downgrade a blocking lock attempt to a
+trylock unless the downgrading code or the callers are prepared to deal
+with that situation. Neither __sb_start_write nor its callers handle
+this at all. For example:
+
+sb_start_pagefault ignores the return value completely, with the result
+that if xfs_filemap_fault loses a race with a different thread trying to
+fsfreeze, it will proceed without pagefault freeze protection (thereby
+breaking locking rules) and then unlocks the pagefault freeze lock that
+it doesn't own on its way out (thereby corrupting the lock state), which
+leads to a system hang shortly afterwards.
+
+Normally, this won't happen because our ownership of a read lock on a
+higher freeze protection level blocks fsfreeze from grabbing a write
+lock on that higher level. *However*, if lockdep is offline,
+lock_is_held_type unconditionally returns 1, which means that
+percpu_rwsem_is_held returns 1, which means that __sb_start_write
+unconditionally converts blocking freeze lock attempts into trylocks,
+even when we *don't* hold anything that would block a fsfreeze.
+
+Apparently this all held together until 5.10-rc1, when bugs in lockdep
+caused lockdep to shut itself off early in an fstests run, and once
+fstests gets to the "race writes with freezer" tests, kaboom. This
+might explain the long trail of vanishingly infrequent livelocks in
+fstests after lockdep goes offline that I've never been able to
+diagnose.
+
+We could fix it by spinning on the trylock if wait==true, but AFAICT the
+locking works fine if lockdep is not built at all (and I didn't see any
+complaints running fstests overnight), so remove this snippet entirely.
+
+NOTE: Commit f4b554af9931 in 2015 created the current weird logic (which
+used to exist in a different form in commit 5accdf82ba25c from 2012) in
+__sb_start_write. XFS solved this whole problem in the late 2.6 era by
+creating a variant of transactions (XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT) that don't
+grab intwrite freeze protection, thus making lockdep's solution
+unnecessary. The commit claims that Dave Chinner explained that the
+trylock hack + comment could be removed, but nobody ever did.
+
+Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
+Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ fs/super.c | 33 ++++-----------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
+index f3a8c008e1643..9fb4553c46e63 100644
+--- a/fs/super.c
++++ b/fs/super.c
+@@ -1360,36 +1360,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write);
+ */
+ int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait)
+ {
+- bool force_trylock = false;
+- int ret = 1;
++ if (!wait)
++ return percpu_down_read_trylock(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
+
+-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+- /*
+- * We want lockdep to tell us about possible deadlocks with freezing
+- * but it's it bit tricky to properly instrument it. Getting a freeze
+- * protection works as getting a read lock but there are subtle
+- * problems. XFS for example gets freeze protection on internal level
+- * twice in some cases, which is OK only because we already hold a
+- * freeze protection also on higher level. Due to these cases we have
+- * to use wait == F (trylock mode) which must not fail.
+- */
+- if (wait) {
+- int i;
+-
+- for (i = 0; i < level - 1; i++)
+- if (percpu_rwsem_is_held(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + i)) {
+- force_trylock = true;
+- break;
+- }
+- }
+-#endif
+- if (wait && !force_trylock)
+- percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
+- else
+- ret = percpu_down_read_trylock(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
+-
+- WARN_ON(force_trylock && !ret);
+- return ret;
++ percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
++ return 1;
+ }
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write);
+
+--
+2.27.0
+