nfc: pn533: Add poll mod list filling check

[ Upstream commit febccb39255f9df35527b88c953b2e0deae50e53 ]

In case of im_protocols value is 1 and tm_protocols value is 0 this
combination successfully passes the check
'if (!im_protocols && !tm_protocols)' in the nfc_start_poll().
But then after pn533_poll_create_mod_list() call in pn533_start_poll()
poll mod list will remain empty and dev->poll_mod_count will remain 0
which lead to division by zero.

Normally no im protocol has value 1 in the mask, so this combination is
not expected by driver. But these protocol values actually come from
userspace via Netlink interface (NFC_CMD_START_POLL operation). So a
broken or malicious program may pass a message containing a "bad"
combination of protocol parameter values so that dev->poll_mod_count
is not incremented inside pn533_poll_create_mod_list(), thus leading
to division by zero.
Call trace looks like:
nfc_genl_start_poll()
  nfc_start_poll()
    ->start_poll()
    pn533_start_poll()

Add poll mod list filling check.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: dfccd0f58044 ("NFC: pn533: Add some polling entropy")
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240827084822.18785-1-amishin@t-argos.ru
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
index 87e1296c68381c9468bcea84c4a4f9b860507be3..4de5205d9d61ba1ad4115c07cca83d22edb3bf3d 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
@@ -1751,6 +1751,11 @@ static int pn533_start_poll(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev,
        }
 
        pn533_poll_create_mod_list(dev, im_protocols, tm_protocols);
+       if (!dev->poll_mod_count) {
+               nfc_err(dev->dev,
+                       "Poll mod list is empty\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
 
        /* Do not always start polling from the same modulation */
        get_random_bytes(&rand_mod, sizeof(rand_mod));