commit
72c7d62583ebce7baeb61acce6057c361f73be4a upstream.
smp_store_mb() inserts memory barrier after storing operation.
It is different with what the comment is originally aiming so Null
pointer dereference can be happened if memory update is reordered.
Signed-off-by: Hyejeong Choi <hjeong.choi@samsung.com>
Fixes: a590d0fdbaa5 ("dma-buf: Update reservation shared_count after adding the new fence")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513020638.GA2329653@au1-maretx-p37.eng.sarc.samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[Conflict resolved by applying changes from dma_resv_add_fence() in the original fix to dma_resv_add_shared_fence() in current code base]
Signed-off-by: Jay Wang <wanjay@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
replace:
RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[i], fence);
- /* pointer update must be visible before we extend the shared_count */
- smp_store_mb(fobj->shared_count, count);
+ /* fence update must be visible before we extend the shared_count */
+ smp_wmb();
+ fobj->shared_count = count;
write_seqcount_end(&obj->seq);
dma_fence_put(old);