[BUG]
When running btrfs/284 with 64K page size and 4K fs block size, it
crashes with the following ASSERT() triggered:
assertion failed: folio_size(fi.folio) == blocksize :: 0, in fs/btrfs/zstd.c:603
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/zstd.c:603!
Internal error: Oops - BUG:
00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1183 Comm: kworker/u35:4 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc8-custom+ #185 PREEMPT(voluntary)
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: btrfs-endio simple_end_io_work [btrfs]
pc : zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs]
lr : zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs]
Call trace:
zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs] (P)
end_bbio_compressed_read+0x260/0x2c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_bio_end_io+0xc4/0x258 [btrfs]
btrfs_check_read_bio+0x424/0x7e0 [btrfs]
simple_end_io_work+0x40/0xa8 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x168/0x3f0
worker_thread+0x25c/0x398
kthread+0x154/0x250
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace
0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
Commit
1914b94231e9 ("btrfs: zstd: use folio_iter to handle
zstd_decompress_bio()") added the ASSERT() to make sure the folio size
matches the fs block size.
But the check is completely wrong, the original intention is to make
sure for bs > ps cases, we always got a large folio that covers a full fs
block.
However for bs < ps cases, a folio can never be smaller than page size,
and the ASSERT() gets triggered immediately.
[FIX]
Check the folio size against @min_folio_size instead, which will never
be smaller than PAGE_SIZE, and still cover bs > ps cases.
Fixes: 1914b94231e9 ("btrfs: zstd: use folio_iter to handle zstd_decompress_bio()")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>