The EDL-1.0 license matches the SPDX template for BSD-3-Clause.
There is no reason why this should be referenced as EDL-1.0, which is
not a registered SPDX identifier for exactly this reason.
License-Update: use SPDX identifier
Signed-off-by: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
DESCRIPTION = "TCF is a vendor-neutral, lightweight, extensible network protocol mainly for communicating with embedded systems (targets)."
BUGTRACKER = "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/"
-LICENSE = "EPL-1.0 | EDL-1.0"
+LICENSE = "EPL-1.0 | BSD-3-Clause"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://edl-v10.html;md5=522a390a83dc186513f0500543ad3679"
SRCREV = "1f11747e83ebf4f53e8d17f430136f92ec378709"